[jira] Updated: (ARIES-549) Require-bundle usage between bundles in the same EBA result in resolve error when deploy

2011-01-20 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] viola.lu updated ARIES-549: --- Attachment: AriesRequire.eba Test Sample for re-produce this problem > Require-bundle usage between bundles i

[jira] Created: (ARIES-549) Require-bundle usage between bundles in the same EBA result in resolve error when deploy

2011-01-20 Thread viola.lu (JIRA)
Require-bundle usage between bundles in the same EBA result in resolve error when deploy Key: ARIES-549 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-549 Proj

[jira] Created: (ARIES-548) Remove references to incubator from code base in trunk and in 0.3-RCx branch

2011-01-20 Thread zoe slattery (JIRA)
Remove references to incubator from code base in trunk and in 0.3-RCx branch Key: ARIES-548 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-548 Project: Aries Issu

Re: org.apache.aries.util

2011-01-20 Thread Valentin Mahrwald
+1 On 20 Jan 2011, at 13:18, Mark Nuttall wrote: > I agree; let's version proxy at 0.3 and defer the discussion about > versioning modules individually. > > -- Mark > > On 20 January 2011 13:05, Jeremy Hughes wrote: >> On 20 January 2011 12:52, zoe slattery wrote: >>> >>> Hi - I remember a

Re: org.apache.aries.util

2011-01-20 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 Regards JB On 01/20/2011 02:18 PM, Mark Nuttall wrote: I agree; let's version proxy at 0.3 and defer the discussion about versioning modules individually. -- Mark On 20 January 2011 13:05, Jeremy Hughes wrote: On 20 January 2011 12:52, zoe slattery wrote: Hi - I remember a discussion

Re: org.apache.aries.util

2011-01-20 Thread Alasdair Nottingham
+1 On 20 January 2011 13:18, Mark Nuttall wrote: > I agree; let's version proxy at 0.3 and defer the discussion about > versioning modules individually. > > -- Mark > > On 20 January 2011 13:05, Jeremy Hughes wrote: >> On 20 January 2011 12:52, zoe slattery wrote: >>> >>> Hi - I remember a disc

Re: org.apache.aries.util

2011-01-20 Thread Mark Nuttall
I agree; let's version proxy at 0.3 and defer the discussion about versioning modules individually. -- Mark On 20 January 2011 13:05, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > On 20 January 2011 12:52, zoe slattery wrote: >> >> Hi - I remember a discussion about the 'util' module in which I think we may >> have

Re: Bundles required to deploy .eba files

2011-01-20 Thread Jeremy Hughes
Hi Charles, I was looking back at some old email ... On 11 January 2011 20:24, Charles Moulliard wrote: > How Aries Application Install knows that the folder to be scanned is "load" ? > How can we override this location > If you haven't already found this out, you can set the system property: fe

Re: OBR resolution issues

2011-01-20 Thread Jeremy Hughes
I'm not aware of any email subject prefix convention in dev@felix to highlight which subproject an thread is about. Perhaps you could start one :-) by prefixing with [OBR] or [bundlerepository] Jeremy On 17 January 2011 10:23, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I guess posting on the felix dev list is a g

Re: org.apache.aries.util

2011-01-20 Thread Jeremy Hughes
On 20 January 2011 12:52, zoe slattery wrote: > > Hi - I remember a discussion about the 'util' module in which I think we may > have agreed that the artifact name, org.apache.aries.util, was out of line > with the other release artifacts. Unfortunately I can't find the discussion, > does anyon

org.apache.aries.util

2011-01-20 Thread zoe slattery
Hi - I remember a discussion about the 'util' module in which I think we may have agreed that the artifact name, org.apache.aries.util, was out of line with the other release artifacts. Unfortunately I can't find the discussion, does anyone remember where it was or what the outcome was? Also,

Hudson build is back to stable : Aries #839

2011-01-20 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See

Hudson build is back to stable : Aries » Apache Aries Application integration tests #839

2011-01-20 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See

Re: Apache Licenses

2011-01-20 Thread zoe slattery
On 20/01/2011 11:22, Holly Cummins wrote: zoe slattery wrote on 01/20/2011 11:14:27 AM: Checking occasionally would would make life a lot easier for the next person who does a release :-) Would it be worth including a check in the build and failing the build if files without licenses are deli

Re: Apache Licenses

2011-01-20 Thread Holly Cummins
zoe slattery wrote on 01/20/2011 11:14:27 AM: > Checking occasionally would would make life a lot easier for the > next person who does a release :-) Would it be worth including a check in the build and failing the build if files without licenses are delivered? Or is that too heavy-handed? Ho

Apache Licenses

2011-01-20 Thread zoe slattery
I've been working through the 0.3 release candidate fixing problems with licenses. I'm wondering if everyone knows how to check for missing/incorrect licenses? In case you don't, this is what I use: mvn rat:check -fn find . -name rat.txt | xargs grep \!\?\? This gets a list of files with miss

Re: Hudson build became unstable: Aries #838

2011-01-20 Thread Emily Jiang
It looks like the xml updated is not valid any more. org.xmlpull.v1.XmlPullParserException: PI must not start with xml (position:unknown @17:5 in java.io.InputStreamReader@1706eb7) at org.kxml2.io.KXmlParser.exception(Unknown Source) at org.kxml2.io.KXmlParser.error(Unknown Source)

Hudson build became unstable: Aries #838

2011-01-20 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See

Hudson build became unstable: Aries » Apache Aries Application integration tests #838

2011-01-20 Thread Apache Hudson Server
See

[jira] Created: (ARIES-547) Fix up wrong or missing licenses in application module

2011-01-20 Thread Mark Nuttall (JIRA)
Fix up wrong or missing licenses in application module -- Key: ARIES-547 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-547 Project: Aries Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Nutta