Releasing 0.4 parent

Hi I've completed the first set of changes that we need to get to a release by bundle process. The next step is to do a release of 'parent'. The reason for doing this is that to be able to test the release by bundle process we need to have a released parent in place. The 0.3 parent can't be u

[jira] Resolved: (ARIES-598) Changes to move to release-by-bundle plan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] zoe slattery resolved ARIES-598. Resolution: Fixed Finished changes required for release by bundle > Changes to move to release-by-b

Build failed in Jenkins: Aries #925

See Changes: [hughesj] ARIES-606 additional patch from John Ross -- Started by an SCM change Building remotely on ubuntu2 Updating http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk U proxy/proxy-ap

[jira] Resolved: (ARIES-606) Can't build subsystem from fresh checkout and local repo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes resolved ARIES-606. - Resolution: Fixed > Can't build subsystem from fresh checkout and local repo > ---

[jira] Assigned: (ARIES-606) Can't build subsystem from fresh checkout and local repo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jeremy Hughes reassigned ARIES-606: --- Assignee: Jeremy Hughes > Can't build subsystem from fresh checkout and local repo > -

Re: [Discussion] Provide an OBR repository generator

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 15:58, Timothy Ward wrote: > > Hi, > > Comments in line, > > Regards, > > Tim > > >> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:31:42 +0100 >> Subject: Re: [Discussion] Provide an OBR repository generator >> From: gno...@gmail.com >> To: dev@aries.apa

Jenkins build is still unstable: Aries » Apache Aries Blueprint iTests #924

See

Jenkins build is unstable: Aries #924

See

RE: [Discussion] Provide an OBR repository generator

Hi, Comments in line, Regards, Tim > Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:31:42 +0100 > Subject: Re: [Discussion] Provide an OBR repository generator > From: gno...@gmail.com > To: dev@aries.apache.org > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:58, Alasdair Nottingham wrote: >

Changes to default parent

Hi As part of the move towards release-by-bundle and getting the semantic versioning correct I have made a change to default parent pom (ARIES-598), this is described below. I have fixed all the projects in our regular build that previously depended on the code that I have removed from defau

RE: SPI-Fly: recent changes

Hi David, I'm a +1 for this. I'm looking at doing something similar with JPA to get load-time weaving in a 4.3 framework whilst still being able to run in a 4.2 framework. I think it can be made to work reasonably well, I'd be interested to see your approach to see whether it's neater than mi

Build failed in Jenkins: Aries #923

See Changes: [zoe] ARIES-598 Add packageinfo for Web [not] ARIES-609 Correctly detect when equinox is in use. [not] ARIES-608 Cope with the current Bundle not having a BundleContext during static initialization.

[jira] Resolved: (ARIES-609) AriesFrameworkUtil uses DefaultWorker on Equinox rather than the Equinox worker

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alasdair Nottingham resolved ARIES-609. --- Resolution: Fixed > AriesFrameworkUtil uses DefaultWorker on Equinox rather than the E

[jira] Resolved: (ARIES-608) DefaultWorker NPEs if loaded during framework shutdownl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alasdair Nottingham resolved ARIES-608. --- Resolution: Fixed > DefaultWorker NPEs if loaded during framework shutdownl >

[jira] Created: (ARIES-609) AriesFrameworkUtil uses DefaultWorker on Equinox rather than the Equinox worker

AriesFrameworkUtil uses DefaultWorker on Equinox rather than the Equinox worker --- Key: ARIES-609 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-609 Project: Aries

[jira] Created: (ARIES-608) DefaultWorker NPEs if loaded during framework shutdownl

DefaultWorker NPEs if loaded during framework shutdownl --- Key: ARIES-608 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-608 Project: Aries Issue Type: Bug Components: Util

Re: Broken build?

Hi, I agree looks like a Jenkins issue. You might be better trying bui...@apache.org. Alasdair On 11 March 2011 11:53, zoe slattery wrote: > We have a broken build and I don't think it is me this time. It builds on my > machine. > This looks like a Jenkins problem - is this something we ask inf

Broken build?

We have a broken build and I don't think it is me this time. It builds on my machine. This looks like a Jenkins problem - is this something we ask infra about? I'm not sure how Jenkins is set up/managed. Zoe

Build failed in Jenkins: Aries #922

See Changes: [zoe] ARIES-589 Add packageinfo files for transaction -- Started by an SCM change Building remotely on ubuntu2 Updating http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/trunk A transaction

Build failed in Jenkins: Aries #921

See Changes: [zoe] ARIES-598 Add packageinfo for util [zoe] ARIES-598 Add packageinfo files for testsupport [zoe] ARIES-598 Add packageinfo files for quiesce [zoe] ARIES-598 Add package info for proxy [zoe] ARIES-598 Update JPA maven bu

Re: Board report Mar 2011

Looks great thanks. Z Looks good Jeremy - thanks for doing this. On 10 March 2011 14:14, Jeremy Hughes wrote: I've posted a draft here: http://aries.apache.org/overview/boardreports/march-2011.html please comment / update as you like. I'll post to the Board on Monday 14th March in time for W

Re: Board report Mar 2011

Looks good Jeremy - thanks for doing this. On 10 March 2011 14:14, Jeremy Hughes wrote: > I've posted a draft here: > > http://aries.apache.org/overview/boardreports/march-2011.html > > please comment / update as you like. I'll post to the Board on Monday > 14th March in time for Wednesday's Boar

Re: Aries Subsystem

Hi John, great. Thanks for posting another patch. Jeremy On 10 March 2011 22:55, John W Ross wrote: > Hi, > > I don't have an explanation for this. I know at some point I had my > subsystem-core pointing to 3.7.0.v20110221 and fixed some consequent compile > errors. Some of these are in the ori