My system default is Java 7 hence it was fixed on that, sorry guys.
On 01/04/15 7:56 pm, "Jeremy Hughes" wrote:
>Cool. Done. Thanks.
>
>On 1 April 2015 at 14:19, David Bosschaert wrote:
>> I've committed this on behalf of Kamesh Sampath the other day. I guess
>> if it works fine with Java 6 t
Cool. Done. Thanks.
On 1 April 2015 at 14:19, David Bosschaert wrote:
> I've committed this on behalf of Kamesh Sampath the other day. I guess
> if it works fine with Java 6 then there is no reason to force Java 7.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> On 1 April 2015 at 14:17, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> Hi gu
I've committed this on behalf of Kamesh Sampath the other day. I guess
if it works fine with Java 6 then there is no reason to force Java 7.
Cheers,
David
On 1 April 2015 at 14:17, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
> Hi guys, is there any reason to tie this down to Java 7. I've built
> with Java 6 and all l
Hi guys, is there any reason to tie this down to Java 7. I've built
with Java 6 and all looks good.
On 16 March 2015 at 15:49, wrote:
...
> +
> +
> +
> + org.apache.maven.plugins
> + maven-co
Hi, I've just bumped the jmx-core-whiteboard dependency on jmx-core
from 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT to 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT. It seems that's been the
pattern recently. But I think this is against our 'depend on the
minimum version' policy. jmx-core-whiteboard should only be depending
on jmx-core @ 1.1.0 as that is t
