Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-04-04 Thread Guillaume Sauthier (OW2)
Good to hear ! Thank you --G 2013/4/4 John W Ross > A vote for the initial release of the Felix OSGi Resolver has been called > and is expected to be completed next week. Once the resolver is available, > I will work on the subsystem-bundle release. > > John > > > &

Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-04-04 Thread John W Ross
A vote for the initial release of the Felix OSGi Resolver has been called and is expected to be completed next week. Once the resolver is available, I will work on the subsystem-bundle release. John > > Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0 > > I'm really happy to see a 1.0.0 rele

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-04-03 Thread John W Ross
This vote passes. Final tally follows. I will promote the artifacts. Binding David Bosschaert +1 Emily Jiang +1 Stuart McCulloch +1 Non-binding John Ross+1 John > 03/27/2013 04:00 PM > > [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0 > > > This is a vote for the release of Subsys

Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-04-03 Thread Stuart McCulloch
; > Binding > David Bosschaert +1 > Emily Jiang +1 > > Non-binding > John Ross +1 > > John > >> >> Fw: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0 >> >> This vote is scheduled to end today at 9:00 PM UTC; however, it will >> obviously ru

Fw: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-04-03 Thread John W Ross
This vote requires at least one more +1 from a PMC member. The current tally follows. Binding David Bosschaert+1 Emily Jiang +1 Non-binding John Ross +1 John > > Fw: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0 > > This vote is scheduled to end today at 9:00 PM UTC;

Re: Fw: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-04-03 Thread Emily Jiang
+1 > > > John > > > > > [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0 > > > > > > This is a vote for the release of Subsystems 1.0.0 and all related > bundles. > > > > Staging Area: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapac

Fw: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-04-01 Thread John W Ross
This vote is scheduled to end today at 9:00 PM UTC; however, it will obviously run as long as necessary. At least two more +1s from PMC members are required. The current tally follows. Binding David Bosschaert+1 Non-binding John Ross +1 John > > [VOTE] Subsystems

Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-03-28 Thread David Bosschaert
to use whatever osgi resolver impl they wish. It's simply there as a > convenience and can be removed. > > Yes, I'm talking about the Felix resolver. It's the only existing impl of > which I'm aware. > > John > > > > > Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.

Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-03-28 Thread John W Ross
mply there as a convenience and can be removed. Yes, I'm talking about the Felix resolver. It's the only existing impl of which I'm aware. John > > Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0 > > Hmm, if it doesn't do anything without the Resolver service I would not > really call

Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-03-28 Thread David Bosschaert
i > > > Resolver so that folks will have everything needed at runtime. There is > no > > > non-SNAPSHOT release of the resolver right now (as far as I know). But > > > perhaps the way I structured that bundle is contrary to normal > practice. > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-03-28 Thread John W Ross
Subsystems requires an org.osgi.service.resolver.Resolver service to be registered; otherwise, it will not activate (e.g., the root subsystem will not be available). It does not provide a resolver itself. John > > Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0 > > Would there be any way to kick off

Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-03-28 Thread David Bosschaert
example, it will pull in an implementation of the OSGi > Resolver so that folks will have everything needed at runtime. There is no > non-SNAPSHOT release of the resolver right now (as far as I know). But > perhaps the way I structured that bundle is contrary to normal practice. > &

Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-03-28 Thread John W Ross
that folks will have everything needed at runtime. There is no non-SNAPSHOT release of the resolver right now (as far as I know). But perhaps the way I structured that bundle is contrary to normal practice. John > > Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0 > > I'm really happy to see a 1.0.0 rele

Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-03-28 Thread David Bosschaert
+1 from me - very happy to see this being released! David On 28 March 2013 04:45, Guillaume Sauthier (OW2) wrote: > I'm really happy to see a 1.0.0 release of subsystems :) > Thanks > > Can we also have the subsystem-bundle (all-in-one packaging) released ? > > --G > > > 2013/3/27 John W Ross

Re: [VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-03-28 Thread Guillaume Sauthier (OW2)
I'm really happy to see a 1.0.0 release of subsystems :) Thanks Can we also have the subsystem-bundle (all-in-one packaging) released ? --G 2013/3/27 John W Ross > > This is a vote for the release of Subsystems 1.0.0 and all related bundles. > > Staging Area: > https://repository.apache.org/c

[VOTE] Subsystems 1.0.0

2013-03-27 Thread John W Ross
This is a vote for the release of Subsystems 1.0.0 and all related bundles. Staging Area: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachearies-023/ Tags: subsystem-api: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/aries/tags/org.apache.aries.subsystem.api-1.0.0/ subsystem-core: http://svn.apache.or