shyam narayan singh created ARROW-5163:
--
Summary: Cast timestamp/date are incorrectly evaluating year 0097
to 1997
Key: ARROW-5163
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5163
Project: A
Renjie Liu created ARROW-5162:
-
Summary: [Rust] [Parquet] Rename mod reader to arrow.
Key: ARROW-5162
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5162
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: Impro
Thanks for getting the discussion started, Micah!
I'm +1 on this change and also slightly prefer 1. As Antoine mentions,
there doesn't seem to be a clear benefit from 2, unless we want to also
support 8 or 16 bit indices in the future, which seems unlikely. So going
with 1 is ok I think.
Best,
Ph
Antoine Pitrou created ARROW-5161:
-
Summary: [Python] Cannot convert struct type from Pandas object
column
Key: ARROW-5161
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5161
Project: Apache Arrow
Le 11/04/2019 à 10:52, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> ARROW-4810 [1] and ARROW-750 [2] discuss adding types with 64-bit offsets
> to Lists, Strings and binary data types.
>
> Philipp started an implementation for the large list type [3] and I hacked
> together a potentially viable java implementati
ARROW-4810 [1] and ARROW-750 [2] discuss adding types with 64-bit offsets
to Lists, Strings and binary data types.
Philipp started an implementation for the large list type [3] and I hacked
together a potentially viable java implementation [4]
I'd like to kickoff the discussion for getting these
