Hi Neville,
Thanks for the update. One question, we have "gold" files for 0.14.0
checked into the test-data repo and run integration tests on those to
ensure we can read them in a few implementations. Does Rust at least read
those correctly?
Thanks,
Micah
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 1:03 PM
The command is exactly what I need. Thanks a lot.
Song
> 2020年7月11日 上午6:21,Sutou Kouhei 写道:
>
> Hi,
>
> Here is the smallest command line to build with c_glib:
>
> gcc -o XXX XXX.c $(pkg-config --cflags --libs arrow-glib)
>
> We don't provide tutorial yet. Sorry.
>
> We provide only
Hi,
Here is the smallest command line to build with c_glib:
gcc -o XXX XXX.c $(pkg-config --cflags --libs arrow-glib)
We don't provide tutorial yet. Sorry.
We provide only API
reference https://arrow.apache.org/docs/c_glib/ and some
examples
Good day Arrow devs,
I've spent a few evenings looking into the issues that we're experiencing
with Rust integration testing.
In summary, none of our tests pass (zero batch doesn't count :) ).
This is mainly because of changes from the legacy padding in the 0.15.0
release, which we never made in
Just to be more specific. Since most JavaScript packages follow semantic
versioning that means that a change from 1.0.0 to 2.0.0 would imply that
there were breaking changes in the API (i.e. not backwards compatible). By
default, when declaring a dependency on a package that has a 1.X release,
Hey Micah,
npm allows you to set the version to anything you wish, but semantic
versioning[1] is the convention. A few large-ish packages don't follow
this (closure-compiler uses a timestamp as its version), but the tooling
strongly nudges package owners and consumers towards semver.
1.0.0
I agree with Adam, the more usage and feedback we can get the better on the
.NET Library.
> However there is no library for C# listed anywhere else in the
> documentation.
We have some XML style doc comments in the code. It would be great if we could
generate a website/markdown from those XML
Thanks for clarifying! And yes, my bad on the typo. I meant to say
format/Schema.fbs
On 2020/07/10 04:27:50, Micah Kornfield wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> > I'm working with Steve on this issue. Can you please share what you have
> > in mind for something more general than Gandiva's serialized
Hi Yash,
My organisation is using the C# library for a product we are working
on. However, we are using a fork which includes a number of bug-fixes
for issues that would have otherwise blocked us. I've raised a few PRs
to fix these upstream.
I think it's fair to say that the C# library is
Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2020-07-10-0
All tasks:
https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2020-07-10-0
Failed Tasks:
- homebrew-cpp:
URL:
https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2020-07-10-0-travis-homebrew-cpp
-
Hi all,
I’m working on a project which uses libarrow to scan and compute.
The project is implemented by “C”, I have found that arrow contains c_glib as
the API for “C” code.
I can compile and install c_glib, but have no idea how to use it.
My project is organized by Makefiles, do I have to
Thanks Micah, that was very helpful! ARROW-7278 looks like a good place to
dig in =]
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 7:33 AM Micah Kornfield
wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> I don't think I've seen a formal roadmap for either Gandiva or Flight
> (others might have more context). What you described is certainly
Sorry, Micah, and thanks again.
Cheers, Gidon
-- Forwarded message -
From: Gidon Gershinsky
Date: Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: Property-driven Parquet encryption
To: dev ,
Hi Michah,
Thanks! I was hoping for community feedback, it's better to discuss these
Hi Michah,
Thanks! I was hoping for community feedback, it's better to discuss these
things now, than during the rull request review.
>
>
> * 1. "kms_client_class" This sounds like it might be a very Java centric
> approach. Have you given consideration to how this can be used in
> C++/Python?
Hi,
I wasn't aware of the fact that jemalloc mmap automatically for larger
allocations. And I didn't yet test this.
The approach could be different in that we would know which parts of the
buffers are going to be used next (the buffers are appendonly) and which
parts won't be needed until
Hi Chris,
I don't think I've seen a formal roadmap for either Gandiva or Flight
(others might have more context). What you described is certainly how a
lot of work gets done. There has been a slightly more formal roadmap
proposed for datasets, dataframe and C++ query engine but that is the
Sorry for the delay. Clearing through my inbox backlog ...
We should double check the code, but one thing that has bitten me in the
past with variable-width data is the binary array builder ReserveData call
[1], does not act the same way Reserve works. The former only grows the
buffer by the
17 matches
Mail list logo