Thank you everyone for the input,
Per Neal’s suggestion here is a PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8130
The implementation for the logic is all in and it runs as expected on my osx
env. but for starterd if fails in CI and I do need to add testing and cleanup
the examples, etc to make
I would certainly be ok with removing Plasma. Factually, it's unmaintained.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 07/09/2020 à 21:06, Uwe L. Korn a écrit :
> If we do that, we should be clear with that and remove the code. Shipping
> Plasma as part of the release and not maintaining it as other parts of the
If we do that, we should be clear with that and remove the code. Shipping
Plasma as part of the release and not maintaining it as other parts of the
Arrow libraries seems inconsistent and will just be an annoyance to user to
find a partly unusable component.
Cheers
Uwe
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020, at
I think that makes sense. They can be reopened if necessary.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 9:49 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The Plasma component in our C++ codebase is now unmaintained, with the
> original authors and maintainers having forked the codebase on their
> side. I propose to
Hello,
The Plasma component in our C++ codebase is now unmaintained, with the
original authors and maintainers having forked the codebase on their
side. I propose to close the open Plasma issues in JIRA as "Won't fix".
Is there any concern about this?
Regards
Antoine.
Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2020-09-07-0
All tasks:
https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2020-09-07-0
Failed Tasks:
- centos-8-aarch64:
URL:
https://github.com/ursa-labs/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2020-09-07-0-travis-centos-8-aarch64
-
