Re: Status of Arrow Julia implementation?

2021-04-12 Thread Sutou Kouhei
Hi Jacob, I, a PMC member, talked to Kenta Murata, a commiter and a Julia user, about this. We support that you and Julia folks work on arrow/arrow-julia until we have enough PMC members from Julia folks. For example, we'll help IP clearance process to import the latest JuliaData/Arrow.js

Re: [DISCUSS] [Rust] Move Rust components to new repos and process

2021-04-12 Thread QP Hou
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:55 AM Andy Grove wrote: > > Hi Krisztian, > > When you say that using GitHub issues is "not the apache way of issue > tracking", are you referring to any particular ASF rules? I see no mention > of JIRA in https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/ and there are other Apache >

Re: [DISCUSS] [Rust] Move Rust components to new repos and process

2021-04-12 Thread Wes McKinney
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:12 AM Krisztián Szűcs wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:44 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > > > > hi Krisztian, > > > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:41 AM Krisztián Szűcs > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Based on the google document I see one actual problem and two

Re: [DISCUSS] [Rust] Move Rust components to new repos and process

2021-04-12 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:44 PM Wes McKinney wrote: > > hi Krisztian, > > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:41 AM Krisztián Szűcs > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Based on the google document I see one actual problem and two actions > > not explicitly solving the real issue. > > > > # Issue: Decouple

Re: [DISCUSS] [Rust] Move Rust components to new repos and process

2021-04-12 Thread Wes McKinney
hi Krisztian, On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:41 AM Krisztián Szűcs wrote: > > Hi, > > Based on the google document I see one actual problem and two actions > not explicitly solving the real issue. > > # Issue: Decouple release process to enable independent releases > > This is something the whole

Re: [DISCUSS] [Rust] Move Rust components to new repos and process

2021-04-12 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 3:54 PM Andy Grove wrote: > > Hi Krisztian, > > When you say that using GitHub issues is "not the apache way of issue > tracking", are you referring to any particular ASF rules? I see no mention > of JIRA in https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/ and there are other Apache >

Re: [DISCUSS] [Rust] Move Rust components to new repos and process

2021-04-12 Thread Andy Grove
Hi Krisztian, When you say that using GitHub issues is "not the apache way of issue tracking", are you referring to any particular ASF rules? I see no mention of JIRA in https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/ and there are other Apache projects (such as Airflow) that use GitHub issues. Thanks,

Re: [DISCUSS] [Rust] Move Rust components to new repos and process

2021-04-12 Thread Krisztián Szűcs
Hi, Based on the google document I see one actual problem and two actions not explicitly solving the real issue. # Issue: Decouple release process to enable independent releases This is something the whole project requires, not just the rust implementation. Eventually every implementation

Re: [INFO_REQUEST][FLIGHT] - Dynamic schema changes in ArrowFlight streams

2021-04-12 Thread David Li
Hi Gosh, There was indeed a discussion where schema evolution was proposed as a solution for another use case: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re800c63f0eb08022c8cd5e1b2236fd69a2e85afdc34daf6b75e3b7b3%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E I am curious though, what is your use case here? Best,

[INFO_REQUEST][FLIGHT] - Dynamic schema changes in ArrowFlight streams

2021-04-12 Thread Gosh Arzumanyan
Hi guys, hope you are well! Judging from the Flight API and from the documentation/examples out there, it seems like data schema is supposed to be fixed per stream in

Re: [C++] Complex type traits

2021-04-12 Thread Ying Zhou
Thanks! I have picked option 2 since it is not really general. Ying > On Apr 12, 2021, at 12:00 AM, Micah Kornfield wrote: > > I think there are three options: > 1. Add it in with the existing type_traits code. > 2. Make the definition only in the code you are working on (I'm not sure > if