[RESULT][VOTE][Format] Add in a new interval type can combines Month, Days and Nanoseconds

2021-08-20 Thread Micah Kornfield
The vote carries with: - 7 +1 binding votes - 4 +1 non-binding votes - 0 -1 votes On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:30 AM Andrew Lamb wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thank you > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 11:12 AM Rok Mihevc wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:12 PM Joris Van

Re: [VOTE][Format] Clarify allowed value range for the Time types

2021-08-20 Thread Micah Kornfield
+1 (binding) On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 7:46 AM Keith Kraus wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 9:49 AM Rok Mihevc wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:46 PM Jorge Cardoso Leitão > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:43 PM

Re: [VOTE][Format] Clarify allowed value range for the Time types

2021-08-20 Thread Keith Kraus
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 9:49 AM Rok Mihevc wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:46 PM Jorge Cardoso Leitão > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:43 PM David Li wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, at 18:33, Weston Pace

Re: [Website] [Rust] Blog post for DataFusion 5.0.0 and Ballista 0.5.0 releases

2021-08-20 Thread Andy Grove
This PR has now been merged and the blog posts are now live: https://arrow.apache.org/blog/2021/08/18/datafusion-5.0.0/ https://arrow.apache.org/blog/2021/08/18/ballista-0.5.0/ Thank you to everyone who contributed to these blog posts. Andy. On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 1:16 PM Andy Grove

Re: [VOTE][Format] Clarify allowed value range for the Time types

2021-08-20 Thread Rok Mihevc
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 3:46 PM Jorge Cardoso Leitão wrote: > > +1 > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:43 PM David Li wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, at 18:33, Weston Pace wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:18 AM Wes McKinney > > wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE][Format] Clarify allowed value range for the Time types

2021-08-20 Thread Jorge Cardoso Leitão
+1 On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 2:43 PM David Li wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, at 18:33, Weston Pace wrote: > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:18 AM Wes McKinney > wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 6:20 PM Antoine Pitrou > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello,

Re: [VOTE][Format] Clarify allowed value range for the Time types

2021-08-20 Thread David Li
+1 On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, at 18:33, Weston Pace wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:18 AM Wes McKinney wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 6:20 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would like to propose clarifying the allowed value range for the

[C++] Coredump when writing Arrow table to Parquet file

2021-08-20 Thread 张帅
Hello everyone, I'm suffering from a coredump issue when writing Arrow table to Parquet file. This issue is stable reproducible when compiling Arrow without Jemalloc. I made some initial investigations: 1. It happened on v4.0.1 & master branch 2. It happened on different distro & different gcc

[DISCUSS][Python] Public Cython API

2021-08-20 Thread Alessandro Molina
While working on https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10162 it was raised the concern that it's hard to change Cython code because it might break third party libraries and projects relying on pyarrow through Cython. Mostly the problem comes from the fact that the documentation suggests