+1 binding
The issue was only a test issue, which has now been resolved.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 15:37, Andrew Lamb wrote:
> Update for anyone following along: we have found and fixed the bug (which
> appears to only affect a test) I believe Neville plans to re-test this RC.
> More details can b
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 14:22, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Le 10/02/2022 à 14:09, Alessandro Molina a écrit :
> > Mentioned this already to Joris, but want to make sure we don't miss it.
> >
> > C-Data and thus ARROW:extension:metadata was mostly designed for shipping
> > data to different processe
Update for anyone following along: we have found and fixed the bug (which
appears to only affect a test) I believe Neville plans to re-test this RC.
More details can be found here [1]
Andrew
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/1297#issuecomment-1034888108
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:43 AM
Le 10/02/2022 à 14:09, Alessandro Molina a écrit :
Mentioned this already to Joris, but want to make sure we don't miss it.
C-Data and thus ARROW:extension:metadata was mostly designed for shipping
data to different processes within the same host.
ARROW:extension:metadata is unrelated to the
Mentioned this already to Joris, but want to make sure we don't miss it.
C-Data and thus ARROW:extension:metadata was mostly designed for shipping
data to different processes within the same host.
If we start using the spec for further uses, including saving it to files
that could be read across d
