Hmm, interesting. So basically you want a PyArrow built against the system
libarrow?
That error is CMake complaining that the CMake files for libarrow were
generated referencing static libraries, but that the actual files aren't there.
Indeed, looking at the Arch Linux package, the static libr
Hello!
*tl;dr. *I want to figure out how to build pyarrow from source (using pip)
and tell it *not* to use static libraries (libarrow.a). Can anyone tell me
if there's a CMAKE flag that the setup.py can propagate, or an option that
tells setup.py not to look for static libraries? I tried searchin
Thanks, yea `ulimit -n` helped to fix it.
Looks good. +1 (non-binding).
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 9:52 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> I have not seen this before -- perhaps `ulimit -n` needs to be raised.
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:34 PM Chao Sun wrote:
>
> > Hmm I'm running dev/release/verify-rele
I have not seen this before -- perhaps `ulimit -n` needs to be raised.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:34 PM Chao Sun wrote:
> Hmm I'm running dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh but is seeing a lot
> of errors like the following:
>
> thread 'arrow::arrow_writer::tests::date32_single_column' pani
Yes, I apologize for the inconsistent naming. Testing version 9.0.2 RC3
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:46 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> Just to be clear, I am voting on 9.0.2 RC3 using the following command.
> However, The email subject refers to 9.0.3 RC3. I assume this is just a
> typo?
>
> ./dev/rele
Hmm I'm running dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh but is seeing a lot
of errors like the following:
thread 'arrow::arrow_writer::tests::date32_single_column' panicked at
'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Os { code: 24, kind:
Uncategorized, message: "Too many open files" }', parqu
I concluded same, I also tested 9.0.2
On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 18:46, Andy Grove wrote:
> Just to be clear, I am voting on 9.0.2 RC3 using the following command.
> However, The email subject refers to 9.0.3 RC3. I assume this is just a
> typo?
>
> ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 9.0.2 3
Just to be clear, I am voting on 9.0.2 RC3 using the following command.
However, The email subject refers to 9.0.3 RC3. I assume this is just a
typo?
./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 9.0.2 3
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 8:58 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 3:
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 3:12 AM Jörn Horstmann
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:38 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
>
> > Update for anyone following along: we have found and fixed the bug (which
> > appears to only affect a test) I believe Neville plans to re-test this
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:38 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> Update for anyone following along: we have found and fixed the bug (which
> appears to only affect a test) I believe Neville plans to re-test this RC.
> More details can be found here [1]
>
> Andrew
>
> [1] https://github.com/
10 matches
Mail list logo
