Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.5.0 - RC0

2023-06-19 Thread Dewey Dunnington
+1 (non-binding) I ran the following on MacOS M1: USE_CONDA=1 TEST_APT=0 TEST_YUM=0 ./verify-release-candidate.sh 0.5.0 0 On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 2:06 AM David Li wrote: > > > > Hello, > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.2.0 - RC1

2023-06-19 Thread Sutou Kouhei
+1 I ran the following command line on Debian GNU/Linux sid: CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=/tmp/local \ dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 0.2.0 1 with: * Apache Arrow C++ main * gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 * R version 4.3.0 (2023-04-21) -- "Already Tomorrow" Thanks, -- kou In

Re: [Parquet][C++] Loading from in-memory buffers

2023-06-19 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Antoine, I just went ahead and tried arrow::BufferReader, which, as it turned out, can be passed directly to parquet::ParquetFileReader as RandomAccessFile.  The rest just worked. :-) Thanks for your help! Kohei On 6/19/23 09:03, Antoine Pitrou wrote: Hello Kohei, You can create a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.2.0 - RC1

2023-06-19 Thread David Li
+1 (Ubuntu 20.04/x86_64) On Mon, Jun 19, 2023, at 16:34, Will Jones wrote: > Thanks for fixing that issue. I can now successfully verify the release on > M1 Mac with Conda. > > My vote: +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:10 PM Dewey Dunnington > wrote: > >> My vote is +1 (non-binding).

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.2.0 - RC1

2023-06-19 Thread Will Jones
Thanks for fixing that issue. I can now successfully verify the release on M1 Mac with Conda. My vote: +1 (binding) On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 12:10 PM Dewey Dunnington wrote: > My vote is +1 (non-binding). Verified on MacOS M1 (both Homebrew and > Conda). > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:58 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.2.0 - RC1

2023-06-19 Thread Dewey Dunnington
My vote is +1 (non-binding). Verified on MacOS M1 (both Homebrew and Conda). On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 3:58 PM Dewey Dunnington wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of > Apache Arrow nanoarrow version 0.2.0. This release consists of 17 > resolved

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.2.0 - RC0

2023-06-19 Thread Dewey Dunnington
Hi all, Thank you all for verifying! The issue uncovered during verification on MacOS M1/Conda (Thanks!) has been fixed [1] and a new release candidate has been issued [2]. Cheers, -dewey [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/pull/242 [2]

[VOTE] Release Apache Arrow nanoarrow 0.2.0 - RC1

2023-06-19 Thread Dewey Dunnington
Hello, I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of Apache Arrow nanoarrow version 0.2.0. This release consists of 17 resolved GitHub issues [1]. This release candidate is based on commit: f71063605e288d9a8dd73cfdd9578773519b6743 [2] The source release rc1 is hosted at [3].

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.5.0 - RC0

2023-06-19 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 2:06 AM David Li wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC0) of Apache Arrow > ADBC version 0.5.0. This is a release consisting of 36 resolved GitHub issues > [1]. > > This release candidate is based

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.5.0 - RC0

2023-06-19 Thread Matt Topol
+1 Tested on Pop!_Os (Ubuntu 22.04) x86_64 On Mon, Jun 19, 2023, 10:55 AM Jacob Wujciak-Jens wrote: > +1 (nb) with conda on ubuntu > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 2:18 PM David Li wrote: > > > My vote: +1 (Ubuntu Linux 20.04/x86_64) > > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, at 05:24, Raúl Cumplido wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.5.0 - RC0

2023-06-19 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
+1 (nb) with conda on ubuntu On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 2:18 PM David Li wrote: > My vote: +1 (Ubuntu Linux 20.04/x86_64) > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, at 05:24, Raúl Cumplido wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > I ran the following on Ubuntu 22.04: > > > > USE_CONDA=1

Re: [DISCUSS][Format] Draft implementation of string view array format

2023-06-19 Thread Benjamin Kietzman
Hi Gang, I'm not sure what you mean, sorry if my answers are off base: Parquet's ByteArray will be unaffected by the addition of the string view type; all arrow strings (arrow::Type::STRING, arrow::Type::LARGE_STRING, and with this patch arrow::Type::STRING_VIEW) are converted to ByteArrays

Re: [Parquet][C++] Loading from in-memory buffers

2023-06-19 Thread Antoine Pitrou
Hello Kohei, You can create a arrow::BufferReader to wrap your in-memory buffer: https://arrow.apache.org/docs/cpp/api/io.html#in-memory-streams and then pass it to parquet::FileReaderBuilder: https://arrow.apache.org/docs/cpp/api/formats.html#_CPPv4N7parquet5arrow17FileReaderBuilderE

[Parquet][C++] Loading from in-memory buffers

2023-06-19 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hello there, I would like to get some guidance on how to load Parquet files from an in-memory buffers. I have already managed to load from files by following this tutorial: https://arrow.apache.org/docs/cpp/parquet.html and I did spend some time looking around the Arrow API to figure out a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow ADBC 0.5.0 - RC0

2023-06-19 Thread David Li
My vote: +1 (Ubuntu Linux 20.04/x86_64) On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, at 05:24, Raúl Cumplido wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I ran the following on Ubuntu 22.04: > > USE_CONDA=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 0.5.0 0 > > Thanks! > Raúl > > El vie, 16 jun 2023 a las 9:10, Sutou Kouhei () escribió:

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Arrow 12.0.1 released

2023-06-19 Thread Raúl Cumplido
The Apache Arrow community is pleased to announce the 12.0.1 release. It includes 38 resolved issues ([1]) since the 12.0.0 release. The release is available now from our website and [2]: http://arrow.apache.org/install/ Read about what's new in the release

[DISCUSS][Format][Flight] Result set expiration support

2023-06-19 Thread Sutou Kouhei
Hi, I would like to propose adding support for result set expiration to Apache Arrow Flight. If anyone has comments for this proposal, please share them at here or the issue for this proposal: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/35500 This is one of proposals in "[DISCUSS] Flight RPC/Flight