Thanks to everyone who contributed to the board update under such short
notice. I always enjoy reading what the rest of the project has been up to
-- if anyone else is interested, the final report that was submitted can be
found below.
Thanks again and have a nice weekend,
Andrew
##
+1 (binding)
Verified on x86_64 mac
Looks like another very nice release. Thanks for keeping the train moving
Andrew
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 2:05 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M1 Mac.
>
> Thanks Raphael.
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:44 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
>
+1
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 12:29 PM Jacob Wujciak-Jens
wrote:
> +1 Sounds great, looking forward to more blog posts!
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 4:40 PM Matt Topol wrote:
>
> > I think this would be a great idea! It's been great seeing various
> > organizations posting on the Arrow blog and
+1 (binding)
Verified on M1 Mac.
Thanks Raphael.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:44 AM Raphael Taylor-Davies
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation,
> version 44.0.0.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
>
Hi,
I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation,
version 44.0.0.
This release candidate is based on commit:
8f44472e5c773f0daec1965253143e94d14c55e5 [1]
The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2].
The changelog is located at [3].
Please
+1 Sounds great, looking forward to more blog posts!
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 4:40 PM Matt Topol wrote:
> I think this would be a great idea! It's been great seeing various
> organizations posting on the Arrow blog and this would be a great
> contribution. Assuming that no one objects, you can
I think this would be a great idea! It's been great seeing various
organizations posting on the Arrow blog and this would be a great
contribution. Assuming that no one objects, you can contribute a PR to
https://github.com/apache/arrow-site
--Matt
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:17 AM Christopher
Hi everyone!
We are currently writing a blog post (
https://github.com/huggingface/blog/pull/1283) about the synergies between
the Hugging Face `datasets` library and Apache Arrow, and how to
use the Compute API to analyze HF datasets out-of-core. This will soon be
published on the HF blog:
Hi, Li
Parquet 2.6 has been supported for a long time, and recently, in Parquet C++
and Python, Parquet 2.6 has been set to the default version of Parquet
writer [1] [2].
So I think you can just use it! However, I don't know whether nanoarrow
supports it.
Best,
Xuwei Fu
[1]
Hi,
Recently I found myself in the need of nanosecond granularity timestamp.
IIUC this is something supported in the newer version of parquet (2.6
perhaps)? I wonder what is the state of that in Arrow and parquet cpp?
Thanks,
Li
Thank you Neil for writing this summary and everyone whose thoughts went
into the discussions -- I think the proposal, as summarized, offers a great
path forward by allowing the various Arrow communities to specialize when
advantageous but remain compatible.
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:59 AM Ian
11 matches
Mail list logo
