+1
Thanks for all the work here!
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:04 AM Dewey Dunnington
wrote:
> +1! Thank you for iterating on this with all of us!
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:28 AM Alenka Frim
> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> > Thanks for pushing this through!
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:44 PM Rok
I strongly agree with Ben's assertion that "the risk of a parallel
ecosystem… is more likely to be provoked by excluding a user's vital
use case [than by implementing support for an unofficial layout
variant]" in the C++ library. But there seems to be a consensus here
that there is a real risk of s
With 5 +1 votes (4 binding) the release is approved
The release is available here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/arrow/arrow-object-store-rs-0.7.1/
It has also been released to crates.io
Thank you to everyone who helped verify this release
On 26/09/2023 17:01, Raphael Taylor-Dav
+1, thanks Felipe for your perseverance here!
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023, 12:55 PM wish maple wrote:
> +1
>
> LGTM, thanks!
>
> Ian Cook 于2023年9月30日周六 00:49写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks very much Felipe for your persistence and your commitment to
> > addressing the numerous questions and
+1
Thanks all for pushing this forward!
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023, at 12:55, wish maple wrote:
> +1
>
> LGTM, thanks!
>
> Ian Cook 于2023年9月30日周六 00:49写道：
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Thanks very much Felipe for your persistence and your commitment to
>> addressing the numerous questions and comments t
The Apache Arrow community is pleased to announce the 0.3.0 release of
Apache Arrow nanoarrow. This release covers 42 resolved issues from 4
contributors[1].
The release is available now from [2].
Release notes are available at:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/blob/apache-arrow-nanoarro
+1
LGTM, thanks!
Ian Cook 于2023年9月30日周六 00:49写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks very much Felipe for your persistence and your commitment to
> addressing the numerous questions and comments that have been raised
> since the beginning of the discussion on this in April.
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 a
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks very much Felipe for your persistence and your commitment to
addressing the numerous questions and comments that have been raised
since the beginning of the discussion on this in April.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 12:34 PM Benjamin Kietzman wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Sep 29, 2
+1
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:51 AM Felipe Oliveira Carvalho <
felipe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, ListView is an implementation of Velox's ArrayVector [1] ("vector of
> arrays"). In Arrow we would naturally refer to them as "array of lists",
> but `ListArray` is taken by the existing offset-only
The vote passes with 4 +1 binding and 4 +1 non-binding votes!
I will take care of the following post-release tasks:
[ ] Closed GitHub milestone
[ ] Added release to the Apache Reporter System
[ ] Uploaded artifacts to Subversion
[ ] Created GitHub release
[ ] Submit R package to CRAN
[ ] Release
My vote is +1 (verified on MacOS 13.6 aarch64)
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:04 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Tested on MacOS 13.5 (aarch64).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 5:23 PM Dewey Dunnington
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to propose the f
+1! Thank you for iterating on this with all of us!
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:28 AM Alenka Frim
wrote:
>
> +1
> Thanks for pushing this through!
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:44 PM Rok Mihevc wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following the discussion [1][2] I would like to propose a vote to add
> >
Yes, ListView is an implementation of Velox's ArrayVector [1] ("vector of
arrays"). In Arrow we would naturally refer to them as "array of lists",
but `ListArray` is taken by the existing offset-only list formats.
Following the pattern adopted by other types in Arrow that use offsets and
sizes, we
+1
Thanks for pushing this through!
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:44 PM Rok Mihevc wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the discussion [1][2] I would like to propose a vote to add
> variable shape tensor canonical extension type language to
> CanonicalExtensions.rst [3] as written below.
> A draft C++ imp
+1 (non binding)
Quickly tested on a couple of my sample code.
Regards
JB
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:01 PM Raphael Taylor-Davies
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Object
> Store Implementation, version 0.7.1.
>
> This release candidate is based on commit:
+1 (non binding)
Tested on MacOS 13.5 (aarch64).
Regards
JB
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 5:23 PM Dewey Dunnington
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (rc0) of
> Apache Arrow nanoarrow [0] version 0.3.0. This is an initial release
> consisting of 42 resolved
Hi Felipe,
Can I confirm that DuckDB and Velox use the same encoding for these
types, and so we aren't going to run into similar issues as [1]?
Kind Regards,
Raphael Taylor-Davies
[1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/l8t1vj5x1wdf75mdw3wfjvnxrfy5xomy
On 29/09/2023 13:09, Felipe Oliveira Carv
Hello,
I'd like to propose adding ListView and LargeListView arrays to the Arrow
format.
Previous discussion in [1][2], columnar format description and flatbuffers
changes in [3].
There are implementations available in both C++ [4] and Go [5]. I'm working
on the integration tests which I will pus
18 matches
Mail list logo
