+1 (non-binding)
pop_os 22.04
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 8:14 PM Raúl Cumplido
wrote:
> Hi Bryce,
>
> This happened on the verification tasks and is related to this issue [1].
>
> It should be solved if you pull the latest main and the related
> testing submodules.
>
> Thanks,
> Raúl
>
> [1]
Hi Kevin,
I appreciate the detailed code review comments you've provided on
addressing the CI failures. I will carefully review your feedback and reach
out on the PR if I have any specific questions.
-Divyansh
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, 1:40 AM Kevin Gurney
wrote:
> Hi Divyansh,
>
> As Dane
+1 (binding) on x86 mac
Thank you Andy -- I know this takes effort to keep going, but it is really
valuable to keep these releases flowing
Andrew
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 4:48 PM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M1 Mac.
>
> Thanks Andy.
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 1:42 PM Andy
Hi Divyansh,
As Dane pointed out, I did leave some code review comments earlier today on the
PR that may provide some guidance on how to address the CI failures.
If you have any specific questions about any of the code review feedback,
please feel free to continue the discussion on the PR, and
Congratulations and welcome!
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:07 PM David Li wrote:
> Welcome, Xuwei!
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, at 11:41, Kevin Gurney wrote:
> > Congratulations, Xuwei!
> >
> > From: Jacob Wujciak-Jens
> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 11:13 AM
> >
Hey Divyansh,
I suggest discussing this on the PR[1] itself. You will get the best
discussion there, where comments can be added to the code review directly.
It looks like there is a MATLAB reviewer that has already left feedback
that may be helpful.
[1]https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/38274
I am currently working on GitHub Issue #38211, titled "[MATLAB] Add support
for creating an empty arrow.tabular.RecordBatch by calling
arrow.recordBatch with no input arguments." As a beginner in MATLAB
development, I am facing challenges with the failing MATLAB CI workflow
associated with this
Hi Bryce,
This happened on the verification tasks and is related to this issue [1].
It should be solved if you pull the latest main and the related
testing submodules.
Thanks,
Raúl
[1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/38345
El mar, 24 oct 2023 a las 20:02, Bryce Mecum () escribió:
>
>
I've failed to verify this release candidate on macOS M1, running
"dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 14.0.0 2" [1]. The failure
looks related to the Go implementation's "parquet-encryption-test".
Can anyone on a similar machine verify?
[1]
I've verified successfully the sources and the following binaries:
TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 14.0.0 2
TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_APT=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 14.0.0 2
TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARY=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 14.0.0 2
+1 (non binding)
I'm working on some PRs coming (reproducible build, several updates,
etc), but definitely not blocker for this release.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 9:17 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC2) of Apache
Hello Bryce,
Gistfile1 includes my result when I tried building (
https://arrow.apache.org/docs/r/articles/developers/docker.html#example---the-manual-way)
from scratch.Before getting to the part of running the docker container I
made changes in line endings of 4 files(as seen in the gist).After
Hi,
We have also been working on generating this benchmark report
comparing the previous release with the new Release Candidate [1].
The baseline commit used is the 13.0.0:
b7d2f7ffca66c868bd2fce5b3749c6caa002a7f0 [2]
The contender commit is the 14.0.0 RC2 commit:
Hi,
I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC2) of Apache
Arrow version 14.0.0. This is a release consisting of 461
resolved GitHub issues[1].
This release candidate is based on commit:
2dcee3f82c6cf54b53a64729fd81840efa583244 [2]
The source release rc2 is hosted at [3].
The
14 matches
Mail list logo
