Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to expand Arrow Communications

2024-02-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Matt Thanks for sharing. It looks interesting and I like the idea. Let me review the document and eventually add comments. Thanks ! Regards JB On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 12:22 AM Matt Topol wrote: > > Hey all, > > In my current work I've been experimenting and playing around with > utilizing

Re: [Discussion][C++][FlightRPC] What stage to submit a PR for Flight SQL ODBC driver

2024-02-07 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi all, FYI, I'm back on Arrow (sorry I have been busy with other stuff). I'm working on the ODBC donation branch, I should have the PR ready by the end of the week. Sorry again for the delay, it's now one of my top priority ;) Regards JB On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 9:45 PM Alina Li wrote: > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Jeffrey Vo

2024-02-07 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
Congrats  Raúl Cumplido schrieb am Mi., 7. Feb. 2024, 14:02: > Congratulations Jeffrey! > > El mié, 7 feb 2024 a las 14:00, Andrew Lamb () > escribió: > > > > Congratulations Jeffrey! Well deserved! > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:30 PM Raphael Taylor-Davies > > wrote: > > > > > On behalf of

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Jeffrey Vo

2024-02-07 Thread Raúl Cumplido
Congratulations Jeffrey! El mié, 7 feb 2024 a las 14:00, Andrew Lamb () escribió: > > Congratulations Jeffrey! Well deserved! > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:30 PM Raphael Taylor-Davies > wrote: > > > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I am happy to announce that Jeffrey Vo has > > accepted an invitation

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Jeffrey Vo

2024-02-07 Thread Andrew Lamb
Congratulations Jeffrey! Well deserved! On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:30 PM Raphael Taylor-Davies wrote: > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I am happy to announce that Jeffrey Vo has > accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache Arrow. Welcome, > and thank you for your contributions! > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal to expand Arrow Communications

2024-02-07 Thread Antoine Pitrou
I think we should find a proper descriptive name for the "high-performance protocol", because "high-performance" is vague and context-dependent, and also spreads unnecessary confusion about existing alternatives such as regular Arrow IPC. I would for example propose "Dissociated Arrow IPC"