+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Xuwei Fu
David Li 于2024年8月6日周二 10:20写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 10:17, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > In
> > "[VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type" on Mon, 5 Aug 2024
> > 08:59:42 -0400,
> > Joel Lubinitsky wrote:
> >
> >> H
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, at 10:17, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> In
> "[VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type" on Mon, 5 Aug 2024
> 08:59:42 -0400,
> Joel Lubinitsky wrote:
>
>> Hello Devs,
>>
>> I would like to propose a new canonical extension type: Bool8
>>
>>
Hi,
>> If you can share how to do this, I can do this.
>
> I'm not sure if I am interpreting this correctly, but if you are asking for
> instructions on how to set up a File Exchange entry - you should be able to
> navigate to [1] and then click the "Publish your code" button. From there,
> yo
+1 (binding)
In
"[VOTE][Format] Bool8 Canonical Extension Type" on Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:59:42
-0400,
Joel Lubinitsky wrote:
> Hello Devs,
>
> I would like to propose a new canonical extension type: Bool8
>
> The prior mailing list discussion thread can be found at [1].
> The format documen
Thanks for the clear write up in the issue and PR!
+1 it is clear that this is something that users want and the downsides
seem minimal.
Velox also switched to 64bit about a year ago.
Am Mo., 5. Aug. 2024 um 16:48 Uhr schrieb Weston Pace :
> +1 as well. 32 bit keys were chosen because the expe
+1 (non-binding)
I reviewed the spec update.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 5:22 AM Jacob Wujciak wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Am Mo., 5. Aug. 2024 um 17:57 Uhr schrieb Dewey Dunnington
> :
>
> > +1 (binding). Thanks for this addition!
> >
> > Looked through the spec and C++/Python PRs.
> >
> > On Mon
+1 (non-binding)
Am Mo., 5. Aug. 2024 um 17:57 Uhr schrieb Dewey Dunnington
:
> +1 (binding). Thanks for this addition!
>
> Looked through the spec and C++/Python PRs.
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:57 AM Weston Pace wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Looked through the spec & C++/python PRs.
>
Thanks very much, Raúl! Sounds great!
Best Regards,
Kevin Gurney and Sarah Gilmore
From: Raúl Cumplido
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 1:04 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Creating a MathWorks File Exchange entry for the
MATLAB interfac
> > With regards to the mathworks account, given the lack of an org-level
> > account the PMC should probably create an 'official' one under
> > private@arrow.a.o?
>
> It sounds like we need to wait on a PMC member to do this before proceeding
> any further. However, let us know if we can help at
+1 (binding). Thanks for this addition!
Looked through the spec and C++/Python PRs.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:57 AM Weston Pace wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Looked through the spec & C++/python PRs.
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 7:41 AM Ian Cook wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > I reviewed the
+1 (binding)
Looked through the spec & C++/python PRs.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 7:41 AM Ian Cook wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I reviewed the spec addition.
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 3:37 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> >
> > Binding +1 (but posted one minor comment on the format PR).
> >
> > Than
Thank you both for your inputs and willingness to help!
> I have a MathWorks account:
> https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/profile/authors/32046345
>
> If you can share how to do this, I can do this.
I'm not sure if I am interpreting this correctly, but if you are asking for
instructions on
+1 as well. 32 bit keys were chosen because the expectation was that
hashtable spilling would come along soon. Since it didn't, I think it's a
good idea to use 64-bit keys until spilling is added.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 6:05 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> I don't have any concrete data to test t
+1 (non-binding)
I reviewed the spec addition.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 3:37 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Binding +1 (but posted one minor comment on the format PR).
>
> Thank you Joel!
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 05/08/2024 à 14:59, Joel Lubinitsky a écrit :
> > Hello Devs,
> >
> > I would
Binding +1 (but posted one minor comment on the format PR).
Thank you Joel!
Regards
Antoine.
Le 05/08/2024 à 14:59, Joel Lubinitsky a écrit :
Hello Devs,
I would like to propose a new canonical extension type: Bool8
The prior mailing list discussion thread can be found at [1].
The format
I don't have any concrete data to test this against, but using 64-bit
offsets sounds like an obvious improvement to me.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 01/08/2024 à 13:05, Ruoxi Sun a écrit :
Hello everyone,
We've identified an issue with Acero's hash join/aggregation, which is
currently limited to
Hello Devs,
I would like to propose a new canonical extension type: Bool8
The prior mailing list discussion thread can be found at [1].
The format documentation change can be found at [2]. A copy of the text is
included in this email.
A Go implementation can be found at [3].
A C++/Python implemen
Hi,
I've opened a PR for documentation:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43553
The "Example" section isn't written yet but suggestions are
very welcome.
Thanks,
--
kou
In <20240725.143518.421507820763165665@clear-code.com>
"Re: [DISCUSS] Statistics through the C data interface" on Th
18 matches
Mail list logo
