RE: [CI] Reliability of s390x Travis CI build

2020-07-02 Thread Kazuaki Ishizaki
:[EXTERNAL] Re: [CI] Reliability of s390x Travis CI build Just looking at https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__travis-2Dci.org_github_apache_arrow_builds=DwIFaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=b70dG_9wpCdZSkBJahHYQ4IwKMdp2hQM29f-ZCGj9Pg=d0xgWL-o-XoU1IbNYu0qkgPOn6pka3XNoJI2sqeVL4M

Re: [CI] Reliability of s390x Travis CI build

2020-07-02 Thread Wes McKinney
interested to know the empirical reliability of the s390x > > Travis CI build, but my guess is that it is flaking at least 20% of > > the time, maybe more than that. If that's the case, then I think it > > should be added back to allow_failures and at best we can look at it > &g

Re: [CI] Reliability of s390x Travis CI build

2020-07-02 Thread Antoine Pitrou
90x > Travis CI build, but my guess is that it is flaking at least 20% of > the time, maybe more than that. If that's the case, then I think it > should be added back to allow_failures and at best we can look at it > perioidically to make sure it's passing some of the time including

[CI] Reliability of s390x Travis CI build

2020-07-02 Thread Wes McKinney
I would be interested to know the empirical reliability of the s390x Travis CI build, but my guess is that it is flaking at least 20% of the time, maybe more than that. If that's the case, then I think it should be added back to allow_failures and at best we can look at it perioidically to make