ew
issue for it:
https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/44285
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [DISCUSS][C++] Can we use "0E+1" not "0.E+1" for deciaml for broader
compatibility?" on Tue, 1 Oct 2024 10:50:41 +0200,
Jacek Pliszka wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am a bit puzz
Hi Kou,
That sounds fine to me.
Regards
Antoine.
Le 01/10/2024 à 03:55, Sutou Kouhei a écrit :
Hi,
The current decimal implementation omits the fractional part
if the fractional part is 0. For example: "0.E+1" not "0.0E+1"
Most environments such as Python, Node.js, PostgreSQL and
MySQL a
Hi!
I am a bit puzzled why it is not 0e0. This seems to me the "natural"
way 0 should be written in scientific notation.
Best Regards,
Jacek Pliszka
> Le 01/10/2024 à 03:55, Sutou Kouhei a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > The current decimal implementation omits the fractional part
> > if the fractio
Hi,
The current decimal implementation omits the fractional part
if the fractional part is 0. For example: "0.E+1" not "0.0E+1"
Most environments such as Python, Node.js, PostgreSQL and
MySQL accepts "0.E+1" but some environments such as Ruby
don't accept "0.E+1".
Can we use "0E+1" (omit "." and
