Thanks Marko for the detailed answer and the references.
Cheers!
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 1:57 PM Marko Grujic wrote:
> Hi Akshara,
>
> > Just for my understanding - the proposal assumes that writes will result
> in
> > a new table version correct?
>
> Actually, the implementation I had in mind
Hi Akshara,
> Just for my understanding - the proposal assumes that writes will result in
> a new table version correct?
Actually, the implementation I had in mind does not make any assumptions about
the
behaviour of writes, it only accounts for the fact that there may be different
versions of
Hi Marko,
Indeed most databases do support time travel/stale reads (specially
distributed databases) , hence an important feature,IMHO.
Just for my understanding - the proposal assumes that writes will result in
a new table version correct?
Asking since, some databases provide stale read support
Hi all!
I'm wondering what people think of a possibility to extend DataFusion so as
to accommodate time-travel querying? This would work well with the new
table formats, particularly Iceberg and Delta Lake, where table versioning
is at the core of the protocol.
You can see some details in the iss
