12, 2019 11:46:18 PM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding Arrow's CI problems and needs
>
> I've started a new section to discuss proposals and current initiatives. I
> know some of us have been working on some things but without much
> coordination so far. It would b
Do we have ticket to track this?
?? Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
From: Andy Grove
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 11:46:18 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Understanding Arrow's CI problems and needs
I've started a new se
I've started a new section to discuss proposals and current initiatives. I
know some of us have been working on some things but without much
coordination so far. It would be good to track these efforts so everyone
can comment on them.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:11 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
> It see
It seems some time has passed here. Would some others like to read the
document and comment? This is important stuff.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 2:20 PM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
>
> The current document greatly summarizes the current situation, but in
> order to properly compare and eventually select a
The current document greatly summarizes the current situation, but in
order to properly compare and eventually select a solution we need a
a detailed list of explicit features with some sort of classification, like
should/must have. For example our future CI system must support
"PRs from forks". Af
I reviewed the document, thanks for putting it together! I think it
captures most of the requirements and the challenges that we are
currently facing. I think that anyone who is actively contributing to
the project or merging pull requests should read this document since
this affects all of us.
On
Thanks Neal for starting this discussion. I will review and comment.
I will say that as a maintainer the current situation is very nearly
intolerable. As by far and away the most prolific merger-of-PRs [1],
I've been negatively affected by the long queueing times and delayed
feedback cycles. The p
Hi all,
Over the last few months, I've seen a lot of frustration and
discussion around the shortcomings of our current CI. I'm also seeing
debate over a few possible solutions; unfortunately, the debates tend
not to resolve in a clear, decisive way, and we end up having the same
debates repeatedly.
