Per my comments on PR, I'm fine as well.
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 12:29 AM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> I'm fine with not requiring param/return tags for now. It will be great to
> enforce just having a javadoc and I think a good description is usually
> enough.
>
> Bryan
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 3:49
I'm fine with not requiring param/return tags for now. It will be great to
enforce just having a javadoc and I think a good description is usually
enough.
Bryan
On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 3:49 PM Micah Kornfield
wrote:
> I've submitted a pull request [1] that enables the javadoc method check
>
I've submitted a pull request [1] that enables the javadoc method check
style rules and added missing javadocs where the rule was failing.
Jacques pointed out that that we might want to tweak the existing check
style rules.
The current configuration ignores anything in a test directory, with
an
