Hi Sasha,
It's tracked at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-17110
There's an initial PR at https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/13991
Regards
Antoine.
Le 31/08/2022 à 00:25, Sasha Krassovsky a écrit :
Hi,
What kind of timeline did we decide on? Is this something that can be work
Hi,
What kind of timeline did we decide on? Is this something that can be worked
on/merged immediately or should we wait until after 10.0 is out?
Sasha Krassovsky
> On Aug 29, 2022, at 2:20 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> With 5 binding +1 votes, 7 non-binding +1 votes, and no -1
Hello,
With 5 binding +1 votes, 7 non-binding +1 votes, and no -1 vote, the
vote has passed.
The next steps will be conceptually as follows:
- require C++17 instead of C++11 in the build configuration(s)
- remove pre-C++17 compatibility measures in the codebase
- start using C++17 idioms and
+1 (binding)
On 8/25/22 04:03, Mauricio Vargas Sepúlveda wrote:
+1
On 2022-08-24 12:50, Weston Pace wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 9:24 AM Keith Kraus
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:12 PM David Li wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, at 12:06,
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 5:35 PM Micah Kornfield
wrote:
> +1, I assume this doesn't impact python wheels.
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 2:15 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > In <7ab9b8ef-d5ca-313f-4b12-79647f32a...@python.org>
>
+1, I assume this doesn't impact python wheels.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 2:15 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> In <7ab9b8ef-d5ca-313f-4b12-79647f32a...@python.org>
> "[VOTE] C++: switch to C++17" on Wed, 24 Aug 2022 17:31:52 +0200,
> Antoine Pitrou wro
+1
In <7ab9b8ef-d5ca-313f-4b12-79647f32a...@python.org>
"[VOTE] C++: switch to C++17" on Wed, 24 Aug 2022 17:31:52 +0200,
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose that the Arrow C++ implementation switch to
> C++17 as its baseline sup
+1
On 2022-08-24 12:50, Weston Pace wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 9:24 AM Keith Kraus
wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:12 PM David Li wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, at 12:06, Ivan Ogasawara wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 1
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 9:24 AM Keith Kraus
wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:12 PM David Li wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, at 12:06, Ivan Ogasawara wrote:
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:00 PM Sasha
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:12 PM David Li wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, at 12:06, Ivan Ogasawara wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:00 PM Sasha Krassovsky <
> krassovskysa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> ++1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >>
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, at 12:06, Ivan Ogasawara wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:00 PM Sasha Krassovsky
> wrote:
>
>> ++1 (non-binding)
>>
>> > 24 авг. 2022 г., в 08:53, Jacob Wujciak
>> написал(а):
>> > + 1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > Benjamin Kietzman schrieb
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:00 PM Sasha Krassovsky
wrote:
> ++1 (non-binding)
>
> > 24 авг. 2022 г., в 08:53, Jacob Wujciak
> написал(а):
> > + 1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Benjamin Kietzman schrieb am Mi., 24. Aug. 2022,
> > 17:43:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2
++1 (non-binding)
> 24 авг. 2022 г., в 08:53, Jacob Wujciak
> написал(а):
> + 1 (non-binding)
>
> Benjamin Kietzman schrieb am Mi., 24. Aug. 2022,
> 17:43:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, 11:32 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I would like to propose that the Arrow C+
+ 1 (non-binding)
Benjamin Kietzman schrieb am Mi., 24. Aug. 2022,
17:43:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, 11:32 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to propose that the Arrow C++ implementation switch to
> > C++17 as its baseline supported version (currently C++1
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022, 11:32 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose that the Arrow C++ implementation switch to
> C++17 as its baseline supported version (currently C++11).
>
> The rationale and subsequent discussion can be read in the archives here:
> https://l
Hello,
I would like to propose that the Arrow C++ implementation switch to
C++17 as its baseline supported version (currently C++11).
The rationale and subsequent discussion can be read in the archives here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/9g14n3odhj6kzsgjxr6k6d3q73hg2njr
The exact steps an
16 matches
Mail list logo