Thanks, Wes and Francois.
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 10:16 PM, Francois Saint-Jacques
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I also agree that we should follow a model similar to what you propose. I
> think the plan is, correct me if I'm wrong Wes, to write the logical plan
> operators, then write a small execution
Hi,
I also agree that we should follow a model similar to what you propose. I
think the plan is, correct me if I'm wrong Wes, to write the logical plan
operators, then write a small execution engine prototype and produce a
proper design document out of this experiment. There's also a placeholder
t
hi Ravindra,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 1:34 AM Ravindra Pindikura wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at the recent checkin for arrow kernels, and started to think
> of how they would work alongside Gandiva.
>
> Here are my thoughts :
>
> 1. Gandiva already has two high-level operators namely projec
Hi,
I was looking at the recent checkin for arrow kernels, and started to think of
how they would work alongside Gandiva.
Here are my thoughts :
1. Gandiva already has two high-level operators namely project and filter, with
runtime code generation
* It already supports 100s of functions (eg.
