Re: Format change review request: ARROW-62

2016-03-23 Thread Wes McKinney
I also addressed ARROW-76 in this patch per Jacques's feedback — more comments welcome! Hopefully these changes are not controversial now that we have a draft end-to-end metadata specification (which includes non-nullable fields, if they are needed). Thanks On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Wes Mc

Format change review request: ARROW-62

2016-03-23 Thread Wes McKinney
Can another committer please review https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/34 This corrects a format specification inconsistency viz-a-viz the bitmap encoding null/not-null from the initial draft format documents. Note that this is orthogonal to the discussion about whether the concept of "non-nul