v@arrow.apache.org
Cc: Lei Hou ; Sarah Gilmore
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the
MATLAB interface
Yes. We should use apache/arrow's GitHub Releases.
In
"Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the MATLAB
interface"
Yes. We should use apache/arrow's GitHub Releases.
In
"Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the MATLAB
interface" on Fri, 10 Nov 2023 19:11:16 +0100,
Raúl Cumplido wrote:
> In case it was not clear, even though the binary job is run on
> ursaco
; To: Raúl Cumplido
> Cc: Sutou Kouhei ; dev@arrow.apache.org <
> dev@arrow.apache.org>; Lei Hou ; Sarah Gilmore <
> sgilm...@mathworks.com>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of
> the MATLAB interface
>
> In case it was not c
umplido
Cc: Sutou Kouhei ; dev@arrow.apache.org
; Lei Hou ; Sarah Gilmore
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the
MATLAB interface
In case it was not clear, even though the binary job is run on
ursacomputing/crossbow when we upload the binaries and
gt; > > Thanks for highlighting this. This makes sense, and we can follow up with
> > > a PR to add MATLAB to the status page.
> > >
> > >> How about creating
> > >> https://arrow.apache.org/docs/matlab/<https://arrow.apache.org/docs/matlab&g
gt;
> We can use GitHub Releases as I said. But if we use GitHub
> Releases, the release notes on GitHub Releases may include
> not only the MATLAB interface but also all
> implementations. It may not be useful for this use case.
>
> FYI: The R bindings have their release notes under
&
thanks or
pointing this out).
[1] https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/releases
Thanks for all your help!
Best,
Sarah Gilmore
________
From: Sutou Kouhei
Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 7:50 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Cc: Sarah Gilmore ; Lei Hou
Subject: Re:
e Arrow release blog posts
> (e.g. https://arrow.apache.org/blog/2023/11/01/14.0.0-release/)
> may also be helpful.
Yes. We should do it. :-)
Thanks,
--
kou
In
"Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental point releases of the MATLAB
interface" on Wed, 8 Nov 2023 20:44:1
ge
[3] https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/content/fx/about.html#Why_GitHub
Best Regards,
Kevin Gurney
From: Dewey Dunnington
Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 8:53 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org
Cc: Sarah Gilmore ; Lei Hou
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][MATLAB] Proposal for incremental
For argument's sake, I might suggest that the process you described in
your initial note would probably work best in another repo: you would
be able to iterate faster and release/version at your own pace. The
flexibility you get from moving to a separate repo comes at the cost
of extra
Hi,
> As a point of reference, we noticed that PyArrow is on
> version 14.0.0, but it feels "misleading" to say that the
> MATLAB interface is at version 14.0.0 when we haven't yet
> implemented or stabilized all core Arrow APIs.
I can understand this but I suggest that we use the same
version
11 matches
Mail list logo
