Hi,
The patch lets you pick the port that the RMI registry MX4J starts is on
when using the RMI adaptor. If you don't pick one it defaults to 1099. To
specify the port add 1098 in the
SystemManager section of kernel.xml.
The patchfile.txt should be attached, if not I've inlined at anyway
Cheers
/spice/components/classman/target/spice-classman-20030605.jar from spice-classman
It looks like the Spice Classman is missing a dependency for Excalibur
I18N. Could someone fix that so that Phoenix builds properly?
--
"You know the world is going crazy when the best
rapper is a white guy, the bes
1.
While proofreading my own code I found that a few lines were missing
from LoggerSwitch.java, if you're qurious it's
< logger.debug( message );
---
> try
> {
> logger.debug( message );
> }
> finally
> {
>
Hello, Developers!
Close examination of the prefix/getDefaultLogger() has brought
me to deep embarassment.
0.
Terminilogy: "internal" LogKit logger is the logger that the
LoggerManager implementation logs its own messages to, like
added logger for category xxx
1.
Here's a excerpt from Log
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 11:02 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
I have no problem deprecating the components you indicated and creating
compatible wrappers for components that are better maintained elsewhere.
At the same time we must be respectful of people that are using the
current components,
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 06:27 PM, Peter Donald wrote:
I would like to nominate Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a
committer.
He has submitted oodles of patches that seem good and it would be good
if he
applied them himself.
+1
-pete
assman/target/spice-classman-20030605.jar from
spice-classman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
target/spice-classman-20030605.jar from
spice-classman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
target/spice-classman-20030605.jar from
spice-classman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/spice-classman-20030605.jar from
spice-classman
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1, welcome Anton!
Cheers,
Marcus
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 08:27:29AM +1000, Peter Donald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to nominate Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a committer.
> He has submitted oodles of patches that seem good and it would be good if he
> applied them himself.
>
> --
Peter,
Thank you for the explanation.
I think "broken link checks" on the avalon-site created by forrest
caused these kind of problems.
To avoid this, put "forrest.validate=false" in forrest.properties,
I guess.
(I tried to build the avalon-site in my win env and took much times, so
I won't to d
Stephen McConnell wrote:
No sure what your talking about here (the reply snipped the info from
Noel).
Could you repost with context.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10542673332&r=1&w=2
- LSD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
donaldp 2003/06/05 19:56:25
Modified:src/conf kernel.xml
Log:
Add commented config option
Revision ChangesPath
1.40 +1 -0 avalon-phoenix/src/conf/kernel.xml
Index: kernel.xml
===
RCS file:
Applied - thanks!
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:43 pm, TULK, Daniel, FM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The patch lets you pick the port that the RMI registry MX4J starts is on
> when using the RMI adaptor. If you don't pick one it defaults to 1099. To
> specify the port add 1098 in the
> SystemManager section of kernel
donaldp 2003/06/05 19:55:34
Modified:src/java/org/apache/avalon/phoenix/components/manager
MX4JSystemManager.java
Log:
The patch lets you pick the port that the RMI registry MX4J starts is on
when using the RMI adaptor. If you don't pick one it defaults to 1
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 12:51 pm, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
> I am not sure. But I once (10 days ago?) posted to this ML patches.
> Ignored? Neglected? Wrong-Formatted?? ... I'm not sure.
The problem is that the files are generated and will be broken next time
someone regernerates the website which is w
Applied - tah!
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 04:48 pm, Anton Tagunov wrote:
> Hello, Developers!
>
> Pleased to hear of my nomination, thank you for your trust!
> I feel an almost irresistable desire to patch everything I work with :)
>
> Meanwhile I've hit a trouble with ServletOutputLogTarget
> and would l
donaldp 2003/06/05 19:49:01
Modified:src/java/org/apache/log/output ServletOutputLogTarget.java
Log:
Strip terminating '\n's off servlet output
Submiteted By: Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +18 -1
avalon-logkit/src/java/org/apac
I am not sure. But I once (10 days ago?) posted to this ML patches.
Ignored? Neglected? Wrong-Formatted?? ... I'm not sure.
I'll attach these again.
Sincerely,
On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 05:17:01 +0300
(Subject: http://avalon.apache.org/whoweare/index.html?)
Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A
donaldp 2003/06/05 19:46:33
Modified:src/xdocs whitepaper.xml
Log:
Fix spelling
Submiteted By: Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +84 -84avalon-logkit/src/xdocs/whitepaper.xml
Index: whitepaper.xml
donaldp 2003/06/05 19:45:38
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Fix spelling
Submiteted By: Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.103 +1 -1 avalon-logkit/build.xml
Index: build.xml
==
Peter Donald wrote:
I would like to nominate Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a committer.
+1
Anton rules!
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Donald wrote:
Basic fact of the matter is that we can release software unless we are willing
to maintain it.
Right. But since maintenance has worked fine up to now, this should not
be a problem.
cheers,
Ulrich
-
To un
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 06:58 pm, Peter Donald wrote:
> > Cornerstone should be released and once it is, there will probably be
> > some patches forthcoming. They should be integrated and Cornerstone
> > should be released again. Then it can move to Sandbox.
>
> Basic fact of the matter is that we can r
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 06:11 pm, Ulrich Mayring wrote:
> Peter Donald wrote:
> > cornerstone has never been released and as such buyer beware. From the
> > rules of Open Source
>
> Cornerstone is used in production systems ==> the code quality is great.
>
> Sorry for sounding simplistic, but nobody use
+1
> From: Peter Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> He has submitted oodles of patches
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Donald wrote:
cornerstone has never been released and as such buyer beware. From the rules
of Open Source
Cornerstone is used in production systems ==> the code quality is great.
Sorry for sounding simplistic, but nobody uses a buggy piece of software
in a production system.
Cornerstone
+1
Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
I would like to nominate Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a committer.
He has submitted oodles of patches that seem good and it would be good if he
applied them himself.
-
To unsubscribe, e
Hello, Developers!
Pleased to hear of my nomination, thank you for your trust!
I feel an almost irresistable desire to patch everything I work with :)
Meanwhile I've hit a trouble with ServletOutputLogTarget
and would like to discuss it.
I'm no Win2K, running Tomcat 3.1.1a (I do need it).
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 05:25 pm, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> The worst of the wrong rules is Rule #1. Developers who believe Rule #1
> are a blight on Open Source. The reason why Rule #1 is so catastrophically
> wrong and so damaging is because of the relationship and attitude that it
> promotes
Peter,
I don't disagree with you, unfortunately, regarding the code quality in
parts of Cornerstone. Be that as it may, there are projects using it. It
would probably help if you, since you seem to have knowledge and opinion,
put together a list of which components are good, which ones are crap,
> Another reference you may want to look at is "The Rules of Open-Source
> Programming" at http://www.advogato.org/article/395.html
> While some of them are fairly flippant and wrong many are on the money.
> Wanna count how many of those rules Avalon breaks?
Since so many of those rules are wrong
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:53 am, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > No one is maintaining Cornerstone yet so until
> > that time maybe best to move it into Sandbox?
>
> No one is maintaining Cornerstone? How do you figure? I thought that you
> and others were maintaining Cornerstone along with Phoenix, and t
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
Agree with everything you said here, Noel. Thing is, if we are going
to sort-of do the merge/common-base thing we've been talking about,
that is going to be a rather significant delay in any release. Not
what Steve is talking about atm I think :D
> No one is maintaining Cornerstone yet so until
> that time maybe best to move it into Sandbox?
No one is maintaining Cornerstone? How do you figure? I thought that you
and others were maintaining Cornerstone along with Phoenix, and that Merlin
supports Cornerstone components. Within the past
Isn't there an UNDO button on your Browser? ;->
Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/06/2003 00:40:44
Please respond to "Avalon Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:"Avalon Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:withdrawn
I wish I had an unsend button for whole In
Yes you are correct, for every "truism" there is always another "truism"
that states the opposite. And the good thing about standards are that there
are so many to choose from ;->
Of course you have to look at all the circumstances that caused the fork to
occur (technical and political) and I do
Leo Simons wrote:
Agree with everything you said here, Noel. Thing is, if we are going
to sort-of do the merge/common-base thing we've been talking about,
that is going to be a rather significant delay in any release. Not
what Steve is talking about atm I think :D
Hi Leo:
No sure what you
Sorry read "Confusion" rather than "confession".
-- Forwarded by David Gray/CO/HIC on 05/06/2003 09:38
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/06/2003 09:25:12
Please respond to "Avalon Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:"Avalon Developers List" <[EMAI
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 09:25 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Interestingly the reference provided by Berin http://www.egovos.org
Another reference you may want to look at is "The Rules of Open-Source
Programming" at http://www.advogato.org/article/395.html
While some of them are fairly flippant and
Will start moving it across tomorrow afternoon unless someone objects.
After that we are back to the sandbox, excalibur, framework and site CVS
modules.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants
us to be happy. -- Benjam
As a lurker, I must confess some confession at the number of containers on
offer. Sort of slows done the selection process as I am attempting to look
at all of them!
Interestingly the reference provided by Berin http://www.egovos.org
comments that one of the strengths of OSS is the tendency NOT
> I would like to nominate Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a
committer.
Good choice.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Found the same problem last night. Was a bit late so did not really get
around to documenting the problem but as Anton reports, Forrest depends on
LifeCycle but did not have an appropriate dependency. It was probably not
noticed by anyone else as it only appears with a clean build and possibly
ot
+1
Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
I would like to nominate Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a committer.
He has submitted oodles of patches that seem good and it would be good if he
applied them himself.
-
To unsubscribe, e
Leo,
> Agree with everything you said here, Noel. Thing is, if we are going to
> sort-of do the merge/common-base thing we've been talking about, that is
> going to be a rather significant delay in any release. Not what Steve is
> talking about atm I think :D
I don't think that Stephen is talking
Hi,
I would like to nominate Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> as a committer.
He has submitted oodles of patches that seem good and it would be good if he
applied them himself.
--
Cheers,
Peter Donald
*--*
| Despite your efforts to be a rom
Applied - tah!
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:51 pm, Anton Tagunov wrote:
> Hello, Developers!
>
> Just thought it would be nice to mention the avalon formatter :-)
>
> --- FileTargetFactory.orig 2003-05-28 10:23:32.0 +0400
> +++ FileTargetFactory.java 2003-06-04 16:49:50.0 +0400
donaldp 2003/06/04 15:15:47
Modified:logger/src/java/org/apache/avalon/excalibur/logger/factory
FileTargetFactory.java
Log:
Note avalon formatter in docs
Submitted By: Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +2 -2
Applied tah!
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:15 pm, Anton Tagunov wrote:
> Hello, Developers!
>
> What do you think of the following patch?
> comment:
> Fortress passes classloader under ClassLoader.class.getName()
>
> --- DefaultLogTargetFactoryManager.orig 2003-06-04 09:27:56.0 +0400
> +++ Def
donaldp 2003/06/04 15:14:57
Modified:logger/src/java/org/apache/avalon/excalibur/logger
DefaultLogTargetFactoryManager.java
Log:
Support passing in ClassLoader under ClassLoader.class.getName() key
Submitted By: Anton Tagunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Revi
donaldp 2003/06/04 15:10:43
Modified:src/java/org/apache/avalon/phoenix/components/manager
MX4JSystemManager.java
Log:
Decruft
Revision ChangesPath
1.33 +0 -1
avalon-phoenix/src/java/org/apache/avalon/phoenix/components/manager/MX4JSyste
http://avalon.apache.org/containers/images/apache-avalon-logo.png on page
http://avalon.apache.org/containers/.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Agree with everything you said here, Noel. Thing is, if we are going to
sort-of do the merge/common-base thing we've been talking about, that is
going to be a rather significant delay in any release. Not what Steve is
talking about atm I think :D
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
cheers,
- Leo
--
> This sort-of conflicts with the desire to be able
> to guarantee continuity of any ASF release by
> having a sizeable developer pool.
There is a real question, which has been raised more than once, as to how
many containers the Avalon community can and should support. It may
certainly be the ca
bloritsch2003/06/04 11:24:14
Added: store/src/test .cvsignore
Log:
add placeholder so that folks are encouraged to write tests
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 avalon-excalibur/store/src/test/.cvsignore
Index: .cvsignore
=
bloritsch2003/06/04 11:23:29
avalon-excalibur/store/src/test - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bloritsch2003/06/04 11:21:44
Modified:storebuild.xml
Log:
remove references to tools.dir/lib
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +0 -2 avalon-excalibur/store/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS fi
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Berin Loritsch wrote:
> Everything in the "avalon-apps" repository has been archived and
> removed, so the repository can be removed as well.
OK, it's been removed, and the entry in the CVS avail file removed as
well.
Brian
---
bloritsch2003/06/04 08:48:37
Modified:fortress/src/java/org/apache/avalon/fortress/impl
DefaultContainerManager.java
Log:
fix invalid import
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +2 -2
avalon-excalibur/fortress/src/java/org/apache/avalon/fortress/im
Stephen McConnell wrote:
In earlier emails I have posted details of the technical things I wanted
to clean up before a release - all of these items are now complete.
things really have improved across the board since I last checked...
I particularly like the way the tutorials are shaping up. Some
Hello Berin!
Currently an excption is caught inside DefaultContainerManager
which results in two FATAL ERRORS in my log: one is logged
by DefaultContainerManager itself and the Exception is hidden
from me, the other is my own FATAL ERROR on a caught NPE.
Let's let the first exception pop up and h
I wish I had an unsend button for whole Internet :-)
The question of the vote was different, I must have overheated..
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Peter!
PR> Adding the new class to excalibur-logger is fine with me :)
It was VOTE, wasn't it? ;-)
-Anton
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everything in the "avalon-apps" repository has been archived and
removed, so the repository can be removed as well.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Donald wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:59 pm, Berin Loritsch wrote:
Phoenix wouldn't compile with the .putJNDIProperty, because the method
was missing from the version of MX4J downloaded by the build script.
The proper substitution from what I saw was the putNamingProperty.
Phoenix downloads
bloritsch2003/06/04 07:05:37
Modified:src/java/org/apache/avalon/phoenix/components/manager
MX4JSystemManager.java
Log:
undo the putNamingProperty() change
Revision ChangesPath
1.32 +2 -4
avalon-phoenix/src/java/org/apache/avalon/phoenix
68 matches
Mail list logo
