On Wednesday 31 December 2003 06:25, Leo Simons wrote:
> Hi gang,
>
> I've been banging my head against the type-1/2/3 split for some time
> now. I started porting my applications to PicoContainer, which is a
> pain-in-the-you-know-where because Pico hasn't got the avalon-style
> release() semantic
Hi gang,
I've been banging my head against the type-1/2/3 split for some time
now. I started porting my applications to PicoContainer, which is a
pain-in-the-you-know-where because Pico hasn't got the avalon-style
release() semantics. So I wrote a type-1/2/3 container:
http://jicarilla.sourcef
Stephen McConnell wrote:
This is a general call for help in verifying the the cli scripts are
running properly on your platform.
works for Fedora Core (sort of like Red Hat 10) AFAICS. I suspect all
linuxes will work fine from a quick glance at the scripts.
- LSD
-
Solaris 9 for intel and sparc works fine for me.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 4:56 AM
> To: Avalon Dev; Avalon Users
> Subject: [MERLIN] call for help on validation
>
>
> Following completion of the vote to re
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 30 December 2003 21:42, Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira
(Engenharia - SPO) wrote:
Let's try to push the JSR 77 within this development.
Not so sure about this. I haven't read the full spec, but doesn't it
sound like, if you are JMX
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 30 December 2003 21:42, Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira (Engenharia
- SPO) wrote:
Let's try to push the JSR 77 within this development.
Not so sure about this. I haven't read the full spec, but doesn't it sound
like, if you are JMX compatible, then JSR-7
-Mensagem original-
De: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Not so sure about this. I haven't read the full spec
I didn't read it either.
> but doesn't it sound like, if you are JMX compatible,
> then JSR-77 compliant tools can "manage you"?
I think Merlin already supports this
On Tuesday 30 December 2003 21:42, Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira (Engenharia
- SPO) wrote:
> Let's try to push the JSR 77 within this development.
Not so sure about this. I haven't read the full spec, but doesn't it sound
like, if you are JMX compatible, then JSR-77 compliant tools can "manage
Let's try to push the JSR 77 within this development.
I wonder if its not a good thing the user to express (metadata) his willing
to expose one or more of his components as MBeans.
Thoughs?
hammett
-Mensagem original-
De: Alexis Agahi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: terça-feira,
On Monday 29 December 2003 12:57, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> With the changes to the kernel creation what we need to do is add a JMX
> management interface to the avalon-repository. From here we can then
> interact with the repository to dynamically load the merlin kernel and
> expose it as an MB
On Tuesday 30 December 2003 10:55, Stephen McConnell wrote:
> Following completion of the vote to release Merlin 3.2 a breaking issue
> was raised with respect to the scripts used to run merlin from the
> commandline under unix. This was fixed and an immediate update was
> posted and a request for
Following completion of the vote to release Merlin 3.2 a breaking issue
was raised with respect to the scripts used to run merlin from the
commandline under unix. This was fixed and an immediate update was
posted and a request for validation of the scripts was made. So far we
have validation
12 matches
Mail list logo
