Re: TCK thoughts

2004-03-11 Thread Jonathan Hawkes
> * * Definition of Specification requirements * * > Specifications are evolvable, meaning at the point of a release, they have a > version and what is in it is set in stone. There can not be any changes to > the specification, and any 'undefined' areas must remain undefined until a > revised versi

Re: TCK thoughts

2004-03-11 Thread Berin Loritsch
Niclas Hedhman wrote: TCK Harness for Containers have the problems of Inversion of Control, where it needs to invert (!) that. Perhaps there needs to be a Specification for Container Testability. The only alternative that I can see is that the Container provides the TCK Harness itself. I think

TCK thoughts

2004-03-10 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Gang, I am sketching on the "TCK issue" and have identified some concerns that I would like to share and discuss. * * Definition of Specification requirements * * Specifications are evolvable, meaning at the point of a release, they have a version and what is in it is set in stone. There can n