On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Nick Pentreath
wrote:
> I'd agree with #1 or #2. Deprecation now seems fine.
>
> Perhaps this should be raised on the user list also?
>
> And perhaps it makes sense to look at moving the Flume support into Apache
> Bahir if there is interest (I've cc'ed Bahir dev
CCing user@
Yeah good point about perhaps moving the examples into the module itself.
Actually removing it would be a long way off, no matter what.
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:35 AM Nick Pentreath
wrote:
> I'd agree with #1 or #2. Deprecation now seems fine.
>
> Perhaps this should be raised on the
I'd agree with #1 or #2. Deprecation now seems fine.
Perhaps this should be raised on the user list also?
And perhaps it makes sense to look at moving the Flume support into Apache
Bahir if there is interest (I've cc'ed Bahir dev list here)? That way the
current state of the connector could keep
