Re: Proposal: file-based IOs should support readAllMatches()

I sent a PR about this all: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/3799 On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:45 AM Eugene Kirpichov wrote: > Thanks. I think I agree that file-based IOs (at least widely used ones) > should, for convenience, still provide FooIO.read().from(filepattern),

Re: Policy for stale PRs

Only apache/beam-site has migrated to using gitbox, I'm not sure why apache/beam has not yet. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Weise wrote: > Is the project using gitbox? If so, there should be a close button if you > have linked your ASF id with your github ID and then

Re: Policy for stale PRs

Is the project using gitbox? If so, there should be a close button if you have linked your ASF id with your github ID and then complete the gitbox account linking here: https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/ Thanks, Thomas On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Ahmet Altay

Re: Beam 2.2.0 release

Add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-2833 which is a blocker to merge DSL_SQL. There may be something wrong in the back-end(maybe RunnerApi) to handle parametered CustomCoder in TestPipeline. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Fair

Re: Beam 2.2.0 release

Fair enough. That's fine for me. Regards JB On Aug 31, 2017, 19:03, at 19:03, Steve Niemitz wrote: >I'll chime in as a user who would love to see 2.2.0 sooner than later, >specifically for the file IO Eugene mentioned. We're using the AvroIO >enhancements extensively, but

Re: Beam 2.2.0 release

I'll chime in as a user who would love to see 2.2.0 sooner than later, specifically for the file IO Eugene mentioned. We're using the AvroIO enhancements extensively, but I am hesitant to run from HEAD in master in production. On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Eugene Kirpichov <

Re: new guy

Welcome Joey! On 31 August 2017 at 07:43, Aviem Zur wrote: > Welcome JB #2! > > Glad to have you on board. > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:38 PM Joey Baruch wrote: > > > my jira username is joeyfezster > > > > thanks > > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:12

Re: Beam 2.2.0 release

There are a lot of users including very large production customers who have been asking specifically for the features that are in 2.2.0 (most of them accumulated while 2.1.0 was being iterated on) - mostly I'm referring to the vastly improved file IO - and they have been hesitant to use Beam at

Re: new guy

Welcome JB #2! Glad to have you on board. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:38 PM Joey Baruch wrote: > my jira username is joeyfezster > > thanks > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:12 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > Welcome ! > > > > What's your apache id ?

Re: [DISCUSS] Capability Matrix revamp

Agree, it sounds like a good idea to me. Regards JB On 08/31/2017 10:35 AM, Etienne Chauchot wrote: Hi, I think Nexmark (https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/java/nexmark) could help in getting quantitative benchmark metrics for all the runners like Tyler suggested. Another

Re: Beam 2.2.0 release

As we released 2.1.0 couple of weeks ago, it could sound weird to the users to do a 2.2.0 so fast. If we have a blocking issue, we can do a 2.1.1 If it's new features, why not having a release pace in October (2.2.0) ? Thoughts ? Regards JB On 08/31/2017 08:27 AM, Eugene Kirpichov wrote:

Re: Beam 2.2.0 release

I'd suggest to do 2.2.0 as quickly as possible, and target 2.3.0 for October. I don't see a reason to delay 2.2.0 until October: there's a huge amount of features worth releasing between when 2.1.0 was cut and the current HEAD. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:18 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré