[VOTE] Release 2.4.0, release candidate #3

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #3 for the version 2.4.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * JIRA release notes [1], *

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_Release_NightlySnapshot #716

See Changes: [rober] Correct EventTime encoding. time.(Time).Unix() returns seconds not [ankurgoenka] Send error response for process bundle progress instead of throwing and [ekirpichov]

Re: (java) stream & beam?

Yes. The very original Python API didn't have GBK, just a lambda-parameterized groupBy. On Sat, Mar 17, 2018, 12:21 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Gbk can be fluent if you pass a key extractor lambda ;) > > Le 17 mars 2018 00:00, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"

Re: (java) stream & beam?

Gbk can be fluent if you pass a key extractor lambda ;) Le 17 mars 2018 00:00, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" a écrit : > Big +1 > > Regards > JB > Le 16 mars 2018, à 15:59, Reuven Lax a écrit: >> >> BTW while it's true that raw GBK can't be fluent (due to