Congratulations!
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 10:31 AM Daniel Oliveira
wrote:
> Congrats!
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:05 AM Etienne Chauchot
> wrote:
>
>> Congrats
>> Le mardi 03 avril 2018 à 10:41 +0200, Kostas Kloudas a écrit :
>>
>> Congratulations
I agree with Robert. In this case one size does not fit all. There are
times, another round trip with a contributor would be frustrating to the
author. Especially for new contributors. Having the option to squash and
merge is useful in those cases. (For reference in the past we even helped
new
Gradle migration continues. Our last update was on April 13th, and since
then there has been significant progress:
Release artifacts:
* Upgrade to latest Gradle PR5104
* Remove evaluationDependsOn and use shaded test jars PR5117
* Nightly java snapshot release fixed by PR5136 and PR 5142 and now
Sounds good, thanks for the update. And thanks especially to Pablo for
pushing https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5149 through in the meantime.
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:38 PM Yifan Zou wrote:
> Thanks Jason for explanation. I am working on Jenkins containerization
and
I think the two options are useful, because we have different kinds of
contributors. Sophisticated users curate their own history, create
logically useful commits, build atop it, etc. and merge is by far the
better option. Others have a single commit followed by any number of
"lint," "fixup," and
Kanban board for python 3:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=245
(Thank you Davor!)
Ahmet
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 6:32 PM, Reuven Lax wrote:
> I had a similar problem.
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018, 6:23 PM Ahmet Altay wrote:
>
>> I
The Gradle build is much more granular in its ability to execute tasks in
parallel, so it's possible that it's doing more parallel work and thus
using additional memory.
When I run a Gradle build locally with the same flags as Jenkins [1], I see
a main Java process using ~2GB of memory and lots
Not strongly against `*Create a merge commit*`, but I use `squash and
merge` by default. I understand the potential impact mentioned by Andrew,
it's still a better option IMO:
1. if a PR contains several parts, it can be documented in commit message
instead of several commits; --If it's a big
+1 Having made a few web commits and been frustrated by the options,
anything to standardize on a single option seems good to me.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 01:49 Etienne Chauchot wrote:
> +1 to enforce the behavior recommended in the committer guide. I usually
> ask the
This seems like a valuable layer of indirection to establish. The
mechanisms are pretty esoteric, but I trust Gophers to know the best way to
do it. Commented just a smidgin on the doc.
Kenn
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:57 PM Robert Burke wrote:
> Hi All!
> While the Go SDK is
That sounds like a very reasonable choice -- given the discussion seemed to
be focusing on the differences between these two categories, separating
them will allow the proposal (and implementation) to address each category
in the best way possible without needing to make compromises.
Looking
Hello,
I just wanted to give an update .
After some discussion, I've realized that its best to break up the two
concepts, with two separate way of reporting monitoring data. These two
categories are:
1. Metrics - Counters, Gauges, Distributions. These are well defined
concepts for
ok, fyi I created a PR for this here:
https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5153
2018-04-16 19:40 GMT+02:00 Jason Kuster :
> I think that should be fine; I believe the way it was that way originally
> was because we already had things set up for building in Jenkins, but it
Thanks for reviewing it. When operating on average there should also be
presented standard deviation. Higher deviation means that we have more
distributed and extreme results results and lower deviation value means
that results are closer the average. It will indicate that tests are going
more
+1 to enforce the behavior recommended in the committer guide. I usually ask
the author to manually squash before
committing.
Etienne
Le lundi 16 avril 2018 à 22:19 +, Robert Bradshaw a écrit :
> +1, though I'll admit I've been an occasional user of the "squash and merge"
> button when a
15 matches
Mail list logo