Re: Hello Beam Community!!!

2018-08-04 Thread Rui Wang
Welcome! -Rui On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:29 PM Griselda Cuevas wrote: > Welcome! > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 9:44 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Welcome aboard ! >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 04/08/2018 04:39, Connell O'Callaghan wrote: >> > Hi All >> > >> > My name is Connell. I am relatively

Re: Hello Beam Community!!!

2018-08-04 Thread Kai Jiang
Welcome! On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 23:59 Rui Wang wrote: > Welcome! > > -Rui > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:29 PM Griselda Cuevas wrote: > >> Welcome! >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 9:44 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >> >>> Welcome aboard ! >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 04/08/2018 04:39, Connell

Build failed in Jenkins: beam_Release_Gradle_NightlySnapshot #131

2018-08-04 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See Changes: [yifanzou] [BEAM-4963] update org.apache.httpcomponents [amaliujia] BEAM-4808: add e2e test for BeamSqlLine. [garrettjonesgoogle] Switching to correct datastore proto package [yi

Re: Apache Beam Python Wheels Repository

2018-08-04 Thread Davor Bonaci
New repository is not a ticket, it is a self-serve thing. That said, you probably want to develop the proposal a bit further, understanding/educating others about the benefits of what you are proposing, any alternatives, why a repository is needed, why the sample repository has Travis CI when ever

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam, version 2.6.0, release candidate #2

2018-08-04 Thread Thomas Weise
+1 (binding) - verified signatures and hashes - built Quickstart with Java Maven archetype against staging repo - verified for Apex runner (embedded + YARN) Please include the acceptance table with future VOTE emails: https://s.apache.org/beam-release-validation Thanks! On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at

Re: Removing documentation for old Beam versions

2018-08-04 Thread Thomas Weise
Yes, I think the separation of generated code will need to occur prior to completing the merge and switching the web site to the main repo. There should be no reason to check generated documentation into either of the repos/branches. Please see as an example how this was solved in Flink, using the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Beam, version 2.6.0, release candidate #2

2018-08-04 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
+1 (binding) Tested with beam-samples, checksum and sig verified. Regards JB On 04/08/2018 01:27, Pablo Estrada wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Extra, extra! The Apache Beam 2.6.0 release candidate #2 is out. > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version > 2.6.0, as follo