Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.31.0,
as follows:
[ ] +1, Approve the release
[ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments)
Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release
candidate, and vote +1 if no
This is your daily summary of Beam's current flaky tests
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20statusCategory%20!%3D%20Done%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20flake)
These are P1 issues because they have a major negative impact on the community
and make it hard to determin
This is your daily summary of Beam's current P1 issues, not including flaky
tests
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20BEAM%20AND%20statusCategory%20!%3D%20Done%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20P1%20AND%20(labels%20is%20EMPTY%20OR%20labels%20!%3D%20flake).
See https://beam.apache.
Update for anyone who might run into this:
I was able to get this fixed by using beam.io.ReadAllFromAvro([input]) instead
of beam.io.ReadFromAvro(input).
After some digging I realized that `ReadFromAvro` relies on splittable
dofns to split reads and splittable do fns are not supported in SparkRun
Hi team,
This is Marco and I would like to be added to the Apache Beam contributor
list, my username is 'marroble'.
Thanks!
--
*This email and its contents (including any attachments) are being sent to
you on the condition of confidentiality and may be protected by legal
privilege. Access to t
High Priority Dependency Updates Of Beam Python SDK:
Dependency Name
Current Version
Latest Version
Release Date Of the Current Used Version
Release Date Of The Latest Release
JIRA Issue
chromedriver-binary
91.0.4472.101.0
92.0.4
Hi Cham, thanks for the feedback
> Beam has a policy of no knobs (or keeping knobs minimum) to allow runners
to optimize better. I think one concern might be that the addition of this
option might be going against this.
I agree that less knobs is more. But if assignment of a key is specific per
u
