Re: [VOTE] Release 2.41.0, release candidate #2

2022-08-18 Thread Ahmet Altay via dev
+1 - I valited python quickstarts on the directrunner. Thank you Kiley! On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:31 PM Kiley Sok via dev wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.41.0, > as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [ ] -1, Do not approve the

[VOTE] Release 2.41.0, release candidate #2

2022-08-18 Thread Kiley Sok via dev
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for the version 2.41.0, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) Reviewers are encouraged to test their own use cases with the release candidate, and vote +1 if no

Beam Dependency Check Report (2022-08-18)

2022-08-18 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
<<< text/html; charset=UTF-8: Unrecognized >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.41.0, release candidate #1

2022-08-18 Thread Alexey Romanenko
Just for reference: it looks that it happens only with default package classes [1]. [1] https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy/issues/1301#issuecomment-1218475514 > On 18 Aug 2022, at 12:40, Alexey Romanenko wrote: > > >> On 17 Aug 2022, at 22:52, Kenneth Knowles > >

Re: Benchmark tests for the Beam RunInference API

2022-08-18 Thread Danny McCormick via dev
I left a few comments, but overall this sounds like a good plan to me - thanks for the writeup! On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 9:36 AM Anand Inguva via dev wrote: > Hi, > > I created a doc > [1] > which outlines the

Re: Representation of logical type beam:logical_type:datetime:v1

2022-08-18 Thread Yi Hu via dev
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 5:14 PM Chamikara Jayalath wrote: > > I think this is fine (even though it would add a small perf hit to > JdbcIO.Read). We also probably should make this conversion a utility method > that can be used elsewhere when we need to encode datetime fields. > We should also

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.41.0, release candidate #1

2022-08-18 Thread Alexey Romanenko
> On 17 Aug 2022, at 22:52, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > Seems like there has been a lot of progress on > https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy/issues/1301 > . Since it has been > identified, I think we can be pretty confident that the version

Beam High Priority Issue Report (70)

2022-08-18 Thread beamactions
This is your daily summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need attention. See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and expectations around issue priorities. Unassigned P1 Issues: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/22749 [Bug]: Bytebuddy