Re: [DESIGN DOC] IcebergIO Timestamp Improvements

+1 Thank you Ahmed! This has been a long standing issue. Hopefully we can finally resolve it! On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 1:10 PM Chamikara Jayalath via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Ahmed. We have run into portable timestamp/instant related issues > several times before (Iceberg, JDBCIO

Re: [DESIGN DOC] IcebergIO Timestamp Improvements

Thanks Ahmed. We have run into portable timestamp/instant related issues several times before (Iceberg, JDBCIO etc.) and it's good to see a proposal that takes a detailed look at this. Added some comments. - Cham On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 8:53 AM Tarun Annapareddy via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wro

Re: Beam 2.67.0 Release

Thanks a lot! On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 11:21 AM Vitaly Terentyev via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I am happy to announce that Beam 2.67.0 has been fully released. For > more information about the release, check out the release notes - > https://github.com/apache/beam/releases/tag/v2

Re: [DESIGN DOC] IcebergIO Timestamp Improvements

+1 good design doc. Thanks Ahmed ! Thank you, Tarun. On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 1:34 PM Ahmed Abualsaud via dev wrote: > Hey all, > > A user recently reported issues reading Iceberg timestamps with the Python > SDK. As I investigated, I noticed some gaps in our timestamp story for > IcebergIO (a

Beam 2.67.0 Release

Hi, I am happy to announce that Beam 2.67.0 has been fully released. For more information about the release, check out the release notes - https://github.com/apache/beam/releases/tag/v2.67.0. Thanks, Release Manager

Re: [DESIGN DOC] IcebergIO Timestamp Improvements

+1 thanks for the writeup, it is helpful and I think I'm aligned with the direction (pending some of the threads). Thanks, Danny On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 9:03 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Thanks for writing this up. In addition to being a clear proposal, this is > a great explanation of some of t

Re: [PR] Publish docs for 2.67.0 release [beam-site]

damccorm merged PR #688: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam-site/pull/688 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@beam.apache.o

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 2.67.0, release candidate #2

Thanks Vitaly! I've done the PMC-only finalization steps. Kenn On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 1:47 AM Vitaly Terentyev via dev < dev@beam.apache.org> wrote: > I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. > > There are 6 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: > * Chamikara Jay

Re: [DESIGN DOC] IcebergIO Timestamp Improvements

Thanks for writing this up. In addition to being a clear proposal, this is a great explanation of some of the intricacies of timestamps in Beam schemas. Kenn On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 4:34 PM Ahmed Abualsaud via dev wrote: > Hey all, > > A user recently reported issues reading Iceberg timestamps

Beam High Priority Issue Report (16)

This is your summary of Beam's current high priority issues that may need attention. See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/issue-priorities for the meaning and expectations around issue priorities. Unassigned P1 Issues: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/35847 The LoadTests Python CoGB