Hazelcast Jet Runner

2019-02-14 Thread Can Gencer
We at Hazelcast are looking into writing a Beam runner for Hazelcast Jet ( https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast-jet). I wanted to introduce myself as we'll likely have questions as we start development. Some of the things I'm wondering about currently: * Currently there seems to be a guide avai

Re: Hazelcast Jet Runner

2019-03-20 Thread Can Gencer
t; know, but is now the responsibility of the "SDK harness", aka > language-specific coprocessor. For Python & Go & here> you really want to use the portability protos and the portable Flink > runner is the best model. > > Kenn > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2

Re: Hazelcast Jet Runner

2019-03-20 Thread Can Gencer
> it would be possible to build something like this on top of the existing > translation. > > Cheers, > Max > > On 20.03.19 13:07, Can Gencer wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > We've made some progress on the runner since writing this more than a > > mo

Re: Hazelcast Jet Runner

2019-03-20 Thread Can Gencer
I had a look at "GreedyPipelineFuser" and indeed this was what exactly I was talking about. Is https://beam.apache.org/roadmap/portability/ still the best information about the portable runners or is there a more in-depth guide available anywhere? On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:29 PM

Re: GSOC announced!

2020-02-29 Thread Can Gencer
Hi, I'd like to also mention that Hazelcast is part of GSoC this year and one of the proposal ideas we have put forward is to implement the portable runner for Hazelcast Jet (there is already an "old-style" runner). It's a good opportunity to understand the internals of a stream processing engine