Re: [Proposal] Track non-code contributions in Jira

+1 On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:50 AM Henning Rohde wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:44 AM Rose Nguyen wrote: > >> +1 Great idea >> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 10:01 AM Mikhail Gryzykhin >> wrote: >> >>> +1. Idea sounds great. >>> >>> --Mikhail >>> >>> Have feedback

Re: [Proposal] Beam website navigation update

Wow, Melissa, this looks great! Thanks for your hard work on this! On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Griselda Cuevas wrote: > +1 > > This looks amazing Melissa! -- The left navigation gives more visibility on > what documentation is available in the website and helps new users follow > the flow.

Re: Help needed with WordCount commands

instructions for all runners -- > > really helps drive home the portability message ;-) > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Hadar Hod > > wrote: > > > > > Hi everyone! > > > > > > Your help is needed with the WordCount [1] documentati

Re: First stable release: version designation?

I also vote for 2.0, for the same reasons Dan stated. As Cham mentioned, we can clarify any confusion in the documentation. On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Ahmet Altay wrote: > I would also like to vote for strong 2.0 with the same reasons as Dan > mentioned. It will be less confusing for the us

Re: Congratulations Davor!

Congrats, Davor! On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Chamikara Jayalath wrote: > Congrats Davor. Very well deserved. > > - Cham > > On Thu, May 4, 2017, 8:51 AM tarush grover > wrote: > > > Congrats Davor > > > > Regards, > > Tarush > > On Thu, 4 May 2017 at 8:54 PM, Frances Perry wrote: > > > > >

Help needed with WordCount commands

Hi everyone! Your help is needed with the WordCount [1] documentation! I'm a technical writer, continuing to work on Beam docs. In getting the site ready for the 2.0 release, I added a “How to run” section to each of the examples in the WordCount doc (staged here [2]). To be more exact, I added a