Thank you Reuven for the response!
I'll update the design doc to include adding support for the generic
classes. As for the new reflection API that's what I propose in the doc as
well, it seems like the right choice.
By codegen path you mean using bytebuddy to generate the constructor and
the
Some initial thoughts:
Making schema inference handle generic classes would be a nice improvement
- users occasionally bump into this restriction, and there's no reason not
to improve it.
I would recommend using the new Java reflection APIs (i.e.
getRecordComponents) to directly infer the
Hi team,
I'd like to propose a new java sdk extension feature, which is adding
support for java record schema inference - see the design doc here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zSQ9cnqtVM8ttJEuHBDE6hw4qjUuJy1dpZWB6IBTuOs/edit?usp=sharing
In short - adding this extension's jar to the
