I'm late to the party as usual, but also added some comments. Overall
supportive of this work. Thanks for the clear analysis, Anton.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:58 AM Mingmin Xu wrote:
> Thanks @Anton for the proposal. Window(w/ trigger) support in SQL is
> limited now, you're very welcome to joi
Thanks @Anton for the proposal. Window(w/ trigger) support in SQL is
limited now, you're very welcome to join the improvement.
There's a balance between injected DSL mode and CLI mode when we were
implementing BealmSQL overall, not only widowing. Many default behaviors
are introduced to make it wo
I've commented on the doc. This is a really nice analysis and I think the
proposal is good for making SQL work with Beam windowing and triggering in
a way that will make sense to users.
Kenn
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Anton Kedin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wanted to gather feedback on changes I pro
Hi,
Wanted to gather feedback on changes I propose to the behavior of some
aspects of windowing and triggering in Beam SQL.
In short:
Beam SQL currently overrides input PCollections' windowing/triggering
configuration in few cases. For example if a query has a simple GROUP BY
clause, we would ap
