So if I understood correctly;
Emulate the SQL precommit / postcommit extension and incorporate running
the test against different runners.
Would be snazzy indeed! A bit beyond my skill set I fear :-)
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 10:34, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Slight point here: @ValidatesRunner sho
Slight point here: @ValidatesRunner should only be for tests that the
runner implements the core model.
Also, outside of the SDK core, you don't need it. If you use TestPipeline
it already picks up the config for what runner. So all you need is to use
TestPipeline and add it to some suite of tests
Thanx!
It would definitely be great to have the ability for folks adding utility /
extensions to be able to have them run against all runners.
Cheers
Reza
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019, 19:05 Lukasz Cwik, wrote:
> We have been currently been having every runner define and manage its own
> suite/tests so
We have been currently been having every runner define and manage its own
suite/tests so yes modifying flink_runner.gradle is currently the correct
thing to do.
There is a larger discussion about whether this is the right way since we
would like to capture things like perf benchmarks and validates
Hi,
I would like to validate some code that I am building under
extensions against different runners. It makes use of some caches in a DoFn
which are a little off the beaten path.
I have added @ValidatesRunner to the class and by adding the right values
to the gradle file in flink_runner have got