Re: Towards a spec for robust streaming SQL, Part 2

As promised, I went of the document and made some comments. I also added a bit of information about the current SQL support in Flink and its internals. Thanks, Fabian 2017-07-30 13:22 GMT+02:00 Shaoxuan Wang : > Hi Tyler, > Thanks for putting all the efforts into a doc. It

Re: Towards a spec for robust streaming SQL, Part 2

Hi Tyler, Thanks for putting all the efforts into a doc. It is really well written and organized. I like the most part. The major concern I have is about the "explicit trigger". I left a few comments towards this and would like to know what the others think about it. Regards, Shaoxuan On Sun,

Re: Towards a spec for robust streaming SQL, Part 2

Thanks for the great write up! I think this s very good starting point for a detailed discussion about features, syntax and semantics of streaming SQL. I'll comment on the document in the next days and describe Flink's current status, our approaches (or planned approaches) and ask a couple of

Re: Towards a spec for robust streaming SQL, Part 2

Thanks for the invitation Tyler. I am sure folks who worked on the calcite integration and others would be interested. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Tyler Akidau wrote: > +d...@apex.apache.org, since I'm told Apex has a Calcite integration as > well. If anyone on

Re: Towards a spec for robust streaming SQL, Part 2

+d...@apex.apache.org, since I'm told Apex has a Calcite integration as well. If anyone on the Apex side wants to join in on the fun, your input would be welcomed! -Tyler On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 4:34 PM Tyler Akidau wrote: > Hello Flink, Calcite, and Beam dev lists! > >

Towards a spec for robust streaming SQL, Part 2

Hello Flink, Calcite, and Beam dev lists! Linked below is the second document I promised way back in April regarding a collaborative spec for streaming SQL in Beam/Calcite/Flink (& apologies for the delay; I thought I was nearly done a while back and then temporal joins expanded to something much