That would be awesome. Full disclosure - I wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> The updated website looks good to me. I agree that it will simplify
> work for a lot of people who are used to Jekyll.
>
> The website is already in the SVN repository. After we have sorted out
> the CCLAs, the only thing that is l
+ 1.
Also, the website repo need not wait for the software grants. It might be a
good idea to get the website into its final destination so every one test their
commit bits are working.
Suresh
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> The updated website lo
Hi James,
The updated website looks good to me. I agree that it will simplify
work for a lot of people who are used to Jekyll.
The website is already in the SVN repository. After we have sorted out
the CCLAs, the only thing that is left is a GitHub sync to make it
more accessible for contributors
Thanks Devor for detailed explanation of the thought process. That
certainly helps.
I do favor feature branches as they are must of major work. The proposed
development/feature branch for the time being is perfectly fine. Just a
caution that keeping the master updated could be taxing. We can certa
