es
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Additionally:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Went over the generated javadoc (filed tickets but no release
> >>>>> blockers)
> >>>>> - Went over the generated release notes
> >>&g
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-438
> [PR #1538] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/pull/1538
>
> p.s. there is a really amusing and confusing call chain: PCollection.apply
> -> Pipeline.applyTransform -> Pipeline.applyInternal ->
> PipelineRunner.apply -> PTransform.apply
ble).
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > the next week we have in Salzburg a DataCamp, a meetup about Big Data:
> >
> > https://www.meetup.com/Salzburg-Big-Data-Meetup/events/231844168/
> >
> >
Hi folks,
the next week we have in Salzburg a DataCamp, a meetup about Big Data:
https://www.meetup.com/Salzburg-Big-Data-Meetup/events/231844168/
Where I'm going to make a session introducing Apache Beam.
I'll share here the material afterwards, very introductory anyway.
Cheers,
icroservice ?
>
Yep, exactly that.
Thanks so much!
On 11/25/2016 01:18 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi JB,
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
>>
>> DoFn will execute per element (with eventually a hook on StartBundle,
>&
cale up and down independently of
the pipeline. So I'm more than welcome to discuss ideas ;-)
Thanks.
Cheers,
> On 11/22/2016 10:39 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like resume the idea to have TensorFlow-based tasks running in a Beam
>&
As an external person who has been following the podling very closely from
the very beginning, I definetelly think you are ready for graduation :-)
On Nov 22, 2016 19:19, "Davor Bonaci" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> With all the progress we’ve had recently in Apache Beam, I think it is time
> we start
se of a DoFn which
actually runs externally?
Thanks in advance for the feedback.
Cheers,
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
gt; >> See you folks there. :)
> > >>
> > >> On Nov 11, 2016 11:25 AM, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré"
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Sergio,
> > >>>
> > >>> "Going Under The Hood with Apache Beam"
JB
>> and I will be there to give a Beam talk Wednesday morning; I'm around all
>> week.
>>
>> I'd love to sync in person with anyone who wants to talk Beam. Please
>> reach
>> out to me directly if you'd like to meet.
>>
>> Thanks!
>&g
.0-incubating, are you thinking about graduation? I think
you should ;-)
On Oct 25, 2016, 11:53, at 11:53, "Sergio Fernández"
> wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >
> >wrote:
> >
> >> By the way, your vote is not bindi
e can discuss it over
the code.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/pull/1206
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-841
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 at 11:53 Sergio Fernández wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> &g
;-)
Cheers,
> On Oct 25, 2016, 11:33, at 11:33, "Sergio Fernández"
> wrote:
> >+1 (binding)
> >
> >So far I've successfully checked:
> >* signatures and digests
> >* source releases file layouts
> >* matched git tags and commit ids
[3]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> org/apache/beam/
> [4]
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-beam.git;a=tag;h=
> 5d86ff7f04862444c266142b0d5acecb5a6b7144
> [5] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam-site/pull/52
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
> runners.
>
Exactly that was the idea :-)
Have you tried more complex setups? For instance, deploy to clusters with
the different runners.
Very interesting stuff, JB!
Cheers,
On Oct 24, 2016, 08:12, at 08:12, "Sergio Fernández"
> wrote:
> >Related, but a bit off-topic:
gt; On Oct 22, 2016, 21:56, at 21:56, Neelesh Salian
> > wrote:
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >I wanted to check to see if there is continuous integration service
> > >used to
> > >build and test Beam similar to Travis.
> > >Would certainly help
awesome!
On Oct 17, 2016 18:52, "Kenneth Knowles" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would to, once again, call attention to a great addition to Beam: a
> runner for Apache Apex.
>
> After lots of review and much thoughtful revision, pull request #540 has
> been merged to the apex-runner feature branch toda
5
>
> I prefer the first option as it is the more Pythonic way of addressing this
> problem. What do you think?
>
> Thank you,
> Ahmet
>
> [1] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Sergio Fernández
> wrote:
>
> >
Great, JB!
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
>
> I already submitted a talk (in July !!):
>
> Introduction to Apache Beam Apache: Big Data Europe 07/10/2016 -
> 21:14 New
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 08/29/2
;d be much more valuable something form the
PPM directly.
Cheers,
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
tegy.
Not sure if it has been discussed. But commonly to version APIs and SDKs
sometimes people uses the following schema:
- version X.Y identifies the API
- version X.Y.Z identified the SDK compatible with API X.Y
Anyway, as we did with the code PR, I'd prefer to keep the versioning for
align the versions [3].
Thanks for the feedback.
Cheers,
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-378
[2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-beam/pull/537
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-547
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747
AA8k_FJeyg%2BGWUBMeSPFQhnaPN3V4MrenJtrDbiyXyKJkzH7ZA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> [7]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-beam-dev/201607.mbox/browser
>
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
>
>> I really appreciate you taking the time to answer things. I'll publish the
>> results of the Q and A on my blog and email out the link once it's up
>> there.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jesse
>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste
My two cents:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Davor Bonaci
wrote:
>
> * For closed (or resolved) issues, "Fix Versions" field indicates a
> released or unreleased version that has the fix.
For us normally resolved issues will always have a development version as
"Fix Versions" field, so the is
lower-level approach and often requires more work.
Sure, share-storage is always an option, but for many reasons I'd rather
not resort to such approach.
Thanks so much for all the ideas and valuable discussions!
Cheers,
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
er API documentation and experiment
a bit with it. Thanks!
On 06/15/2016 10:18 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>
>> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Welcome aboard, and good to disc
the next release :-)
Thanks.
>
> On 06/14/2016 12:38 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm newbie in the Beam community, but as someone who has used DataFlow in
>> the past I've been following the podling since you came to ASK. I'
f the runner. Each
> > runner/backend will implement their own logic.
> >
> > I don't know Keras enough to provide a strong advice.
> >
> > Regarding the Python SDK, we discussed about that last week: it's on the
> > way. We should have the Python SDK ver
ning, so I'd like to know if the
Beam Model could natively support the distribution of the models (sometimes
several GB).
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
--
Sergio Fernández
Partner Technology Manager
Redlink GmbH
m: +43 6602747925
e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co
w: http://redlink.co
30 matches
Mail list logo
