Hello everyone,
This email is a follow-up to the Apache Beam Dev/PPMC meeting from last
week, April 1st, in San Jose, California. The complete presentation from
this meeting, with meeting notes inside of the "speaker notes" can be found
here:
https://goo.gl/5JcVss
Full notes for the m
Hmmm, let me check on the moderator view. It's maybe ezmlm that changes
some e-mail to avoid flooding and rebound.
Regards
JB
On 02/05/2016 07:24 PM, Tyler Akidau wrote:
Strange, I see that too. JB: any ideas? I just subscribed by emailing
"subscribe" to the subscription alias. Is there someth
Maybe the addresses were re-routed because the domain "google.com" was for
sale again. That seems to happen once in a while ;-)
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Dan Halperin
wrote:
> This is how Tyler found out he got fired. Oh crap, me too.
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Tyler Akidau
> wr
:-)
Trying from my shiny new @apache.org address, to see if that's somehow
different.
-Tyler
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:25 AM Dan Halperin
wrote:
> This is how Tyler found out he got fired. Oh crap, me too.
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Tyler Akidau
> wrote:
>
> > Strange, I see that to
This is how Tyler found out he got fired. Oh crap, me too.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Tyler Akidau
wrote:
> Strange, I see that too. JB: any ideas? I just subscribed by emailing
> "subscribe" to the subscription alias. Is there something else we're
> supposed to do?
>
> -Tyler
>
> On Fri,
Strange, I see that too. JB: any ideas? I just subscribed by emailing
"subscribe" to the subscription alias. Is there something else we're
supposed to do?
-Tyler
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:02 AM Aljoscha Krettek
wrote:
> @google people: Your mail addresses are all “*@google.com.invalid”. Maybe
>
@google people: Your mail addresses are all “*@google.com.invalid”. Maybe this
just happens in my client or maybe it’s some problem with the mailing list.
> On 05 Feb 2016, at 18:49, Tyler Akidau wrote:
>
> Yeah, it is here too. And in the USA I think there's generally a positive
> association w
Yeah, it is here too. And in the USA I think there's generally a positive
association with that term due to BMW being seen as a more of a luxury
brand. Does that impression hold in other areas of the world as well?
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:09 AM Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> Btw, a beamer is also a
Btw, a beamer is also a BMW car. :-) (at least in britain)
> On 05 Feb 2016, at 17:32, Amit Sela wrote:
>
> So a Beamer is a member of The BeamTeam ?
> ;)
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016, 18:21 Frances Perry wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> wrote:
>>
>>> By the way
So a Beamer is a member of The BeamTeam ?
;)
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016, 18:21 Frances Perry wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
>
> > By the way Tyler, it's the first time that I'm named "beamer" ;)
> >
> > Got bunch of "bird names" during rugby games, but never bea
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> By the way Tyler, it's the first time that I'm named "beamer" ;)
>
> Got bunch of "bird names" during rugby games, but never beamer. I'm proud
> of this one ;)
>
Not quite as much fun as "Dataflower", but it'll do ;-)
ks to everyone
> at Google for being so straightforward on this matter.
>
> Best,
> Max
>
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Tyler Akidau wrote:
> > Hello Beamers!
> >
> >
> > To summarize a discussion that started while infrastructure was being set
> > up
at started while infrastructure was being set
up:
- Google folks proposed a PPMC composed of a subset of the initial
committers.
- Multiple folks pointed out that the rules say the PPMC is to be
initial committers + mentors.
- Multiple folks also noted they would be fine with the
re was being set
> up:
>
>- Google folks proposed a PPMC composed of a subset of the initial
>committers.
>- Multiple folks pointed out that the rules say the PPMC is to be
>initial committers + mentors.
>- Multiple folks also noted they would be fin
rote:
>
>> Hello Beamers!
>>
>> To summarize a discussion that started while infrastructure was being set
>> up:
>>
>> - Google folks proposed a PPMC composed of a subset of the initial
>> committers.
>> - Multiple folks
Hi Tyler,
As discussed, initial committers + mentors makes sense ;)
Regards
JB
On 02/05/2016 08:18 AM, Tyler Akidau wrote:
Hello Beamers!
To summarize a discussion that started while infrastructure was being set
up:
- Google folks proposed a PPMC composed of a subset of the initial
Hello Beamers!
To summarize a discussion that started while infrastructure was being set
up:
- Google folks proposed a PPMC composed of a subset of the initial
committers.
- Multiple folks pointed out that the rules say the PPMC is to be
initial committers + mentors.
- Multiple
17 matches
Mail list logo
