Le Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:02:07AM +0900, Kengo Seki a écrit:
> and let me know if you have any other fixes that you would like to
> merge into 3.0.0 ;)
Debian 11 (bullseye) support ? :) It was released two weeks ago. Is it at least
possible to have an automated test to see what works and what doe
Hello,
Le Tue, May 11, 2021 at 09:02:57AM +0900, Kengo Seki a écrit:
> Is it OK with you, or would you like to include Debian 11 support in this
> release?
That depends on the timeframe for bigtop 3, I think. I suspect Debian 11 will be
release in about 2 months. If bigtop3 is to be released thi
Le Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 10:21:17PM +0100, Olaf Flebbe a écrit:
> Sorry for not mentioning explicitly:
> At Bigtop, anyone on this mailinglist can vote.
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> If you have further questions please do not hesitate to ask here or mail me
> directly.
+1 the
Le Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 09:26:01PM +0100, Olaf Flebbe a écrit:
> +1 by Bruno, Konstantin, Youngwoo, Evans, Jun, myself and a somewhat +1 by
> Jay.
Out of curiosity, who is supposed to be voting anyway ?
Arnaud.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Arnaud Launay created BIGTOP-3107:
-
Summary: QFS cannot compile with newer Oracle SDK
Key: BIGTOP-3107
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-3107
Project: Bigtop
Issue Type: Bug
Le Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 09:39:14PM -0500, Peter Linnell a écrit:
> 2. As puppetlabs only supports x86, using their upstream packages is
> less than ideal. Dropping support for non-x86 arches is very
> undesirable for many many reasons.
Yes, that was one thing I did not saw. I thought they would o
Le Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 09:48:30PM +0100, Olaf Flebbe a écrit:
> c) please fill in your suggestion, if you are at least
> pondering with the idea to help bigtop community going that
> way.
> ---> So my next question to bigtop community <--
> Would you like to follow bigtop the a
Le Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 01:20:18AM +0800, Evans Ye a écrit:
> To summarize the vote result:
> The vote is REJECTED with 3 binding +1s, 1 binding -1 and 1 non-binding -1.
Just out of curiosity: 1 binding -1 is sufficient to derail the
vote ?
Because to me, if you say something like "binding counts
Le Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:45:50AM +0800, Evans Ye a écrit:
> 1. Somehow packages on centos and debian changed. If we rebuild
> bigtop/slaves for trunk, then Solr will fail the same as what we faced
> building with 1.2.1 images.
> 2. We've special tweaks for bigtop/slaves trunk images.
> Any though
Le Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 02:02:09PM -0700, Konstantin Boudnik a écrit:
> We cannot assume the responsibility for a 3rd party component that
> violates Foundation's position on the licenses. Nor we have the
> resource to audit and fix the issues ourselves.
Given the file... Maybe a small email to th
Arnaud Launay created BIGTOP-2788:
-
Summary: Corrects Apex patch for version 3.6.0
Key: BIGTOP-2788
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2788
Project: Bigtop
Issue Type: Bug
Le Mon, May 29, 2017 at 10:24:34AM +0800, Evans Ye a écrit:
> Surely we can add Solr 6.5.1(BIGTOP-2784) to 1.2.1 release. Do
> you have time to get it to the finish line recently?
Unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge about it to really
understand what's needed and what's not, the install.s
Le Sun, May 28, 2017 at 06:54:53PM +0800, Evans Ye a écrit:
> Please feel free to throw your thoughts for features you'd like to be
> included in 1.2.1. Currently we have 6 issues for 1.2.1 need to be fixed.
If not an updated solr, I would love to have a 4.10.4 solr that
does compile under Java 8.
Arnaud Launay created BIGTOP-2784:
-
Summary: Bump version of Solr to 6.5.1
Key: BIGTOP-2784
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2784
Project: Bigtop
Issue Type: Improvement
Le Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 07:49:05AM +0200, Olaf Flebbe a écrit:
> Dependency convergence error for org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper:3.4.10 paths
> to dependency are:
> +-org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-yarn-server-tests:2.7.3
> +-org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-common:2.7.3
> +-org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-auth:
Le Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 03:27:29PM +, alaunay a écrit:
> GitHub user alaunay opened a pull request:
> https://github.com/apache/bigtop/pull/198
This went sideways... I thought I could create multiple pull
requests, but the patches I added after that pull were
automatically added, and are /
Le Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:56:20AM -0700, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit:
> it seems that we may have enough things
> patched to warrant 1.2.1
> Just in case I created the version tag and
> tagged a few issues with it. I'll let it stew
> until mid next week and then we can decide.
> Sounds good?
I've go
Hello,
Given that bigtop only supports Java 8 now, it might be a good
time to revert BIGTOP-2240 ?
[WARNING] OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option PermSize=64m;
support was removed in 8.0
[WARNING] OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option MaxPermSize=512m;
support was remov
Le Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:40:14AM -0700, Andrew Musselman a écrit:
> Cool, I can get into it later in the week; do you have a branch
> I could check out?
No, not yet, I'm just poking around it. I can send you the little
diff by mail if you want.
Arnaud.
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Le Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 07:59:24AM -0700, Konstantin Boudnik a écrit:
> No particular reason, except for no one has made the effort to
> update it. If you are interested - that'd be great!
I've already begun to work on it (4.10.4 doesn't compile with the
jdk8/u121 used by debian, some story with j
Hello,
Is there any particular reason why solr is only at version 4.10.4
(march 2015) and not a recent one (like 6.5.0, march 2017) ?
Arnaud.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Le Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 03:01:04PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit:
> Thank you all for taking Bigtop 1.2.0 for a spin! I'll do the final
> steps of release publishing shortly.
It still doesn't compile under my Debian Jessie :/
Arnaud.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Le Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 01:42:22PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit:
> Can you, please, file an issue and attach some kind of debug
> output from Maven?
Done: BIGTOP-2729
> Also, is git available in your build environment?
Yes:
$ git --version
git version 2.1.4
Arnaud.
signature.asc
Arnaud Launay created BIGTOP-2729:
-
Summary: Ambari 2.5 ODPI doesn't compile
Key: BIGTOP-2729
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2729
Project: Bigtop
Issue Type
Le Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:58:16AM -0700, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit:
> Java 7 is no longer supported by Bigtop.
Doesn't matter here. Tried with java8:
asl@i005:~/buildjava8$ cat /etc/debian_version
8.7
asl@i005:~/buildjava8$ java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_121"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (b
Le Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 07:20:42PM +, Roman Shaposhnik (JIRA) a écrit:
> Summary: Bump ambari version to 2.5
Does not compile entirely here
(Debian 8 / Java 7):
[INFO]
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO]
Le Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:21:31AM +0100, Olaf Flebbe a écrit:
> this totally makes sense! I like it.
Given nobody seems to object, I pushed the patches to Jira:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2649
Arnaud.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Le Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 05:09:17PM -0800, Konstantin Boudnik a écrit:
> Any chance this could be attached to a JIRA in the form of a patch?
Yes it will, I was just hoping for some comments like "please
modify this" or "this is good / this is not" before putting them
on jira :)
Arnaud.
s
Le Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 05:32:09PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik a écrit:
> you're bringing up some good points. Let me ask you this, though:
> do you think your concerns would be take care of if we had a way
> to instruct whatever version of JDK we're using to generate 7
> bytecode via -target 7 -source
---
BUILDING.txt | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/BUILDING.txt b/BUILDING.txt
index bb1ae4e..85ff0c2 100644
--- a/BUILDING.txt
+++ b/BUILDING.txt
@@ -81,4 +81,24 @@ A nightly build job can be created with
For more background information on BIGTOP_BUILD_STA
---
packages.gradle | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/packages.gradle b/packages.gradle
index c00efc6..f6b8543 100644
--- a/packages.gradle
+++ b/packages.gradle
@@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ def genTasks = { target ->
--preserve-envvar MAVEN3_HOME \
--preserve-envvar MAVEN_OPTS \
--pre
---
bigtop.bom | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/bigtop.bom b/bigtop.bom
index 45fd248..b81cee4 100644
--- a/bigtop.bom
+++ b/bigtop.bom
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ bigtop {
/** Base Configuration of the mirror and archives */
version = "1.2.0-SNAPSHOT"
stack {
-
Comments are welcome on this series. If it feels all right, I'll
add them to jira for future commit.
Arnaud.
---
bigtop-packages/src/common/crunch/do-component-build | 7 ++-
bigtop-packages/src/common/hbase/do-component-build | 6 +-
bigtop-packages/src/common/sqoop2/do-compo
Hello,
Le Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 06:03:42PM +0100, Olaf Flebbe a écrit:
> > https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/installing-openjdk-8-tomcat-debian-jessie-iga-made-muliarsa
> what Do you want us to tell ? We are already doing this.
For the record, my request to still be able to compile bigtop
with JDK7
Arnaud Launay created BIGTOP-2649:
-
Summary: Default Java8 blocks default debian jdk
Key: BIGTOP-2649
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2649
Project: Bigtop
Issue Type: Bug
Arnaud Launay created BIGTOP-2648:
-
Summary: Gradle 2.7 SSL Problems
Key: BIGTOP-2648
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2648
Project: Bigtop
Issue Type: Bug
36 matches
Mail list logo
