Re: BookKeeper release 4.4 plan

2016-05-04 Thread Flavio Junqueira
There is no pending issue for 4.4.0 according to jira, so the plan sounds good to me, +1. -Flavio > On 04 May 2016, at 20:10, Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri wrote: > > +1. > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > >> No objections. +1 for the

Re: BookKeeper release 4.4 plan

2016-05-04 Thread Venkateswara Rao Jujjuri
+1. On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > No objections. +1 for the release plan. > > Sijie > > On Wednesday, May 4, 2016, Matteo Merli wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > we should have all the changes planned for 4.4 release already merged in > >

Re: BookKeeper release 4.4 plan

2016-05-04 Thread Sijie Guo
No objections. +1 for the release plan. Sijie On Wednesday, May 4, 2016, Matteo Merli wrote: > Hi all, > > we should have all the changes planned for 4.4 release already merged in > master and build seems to be good. > > If there are no objections or suggestions for Jiras

BookKeeper release 4.4 plan

2016-05-04 Thread Matteo Merli
Hi all, we should have all the changes planned for 4.4 release already merged in master and build seems to be good. If there are no objections or suggestions for Jiras that you think should be considered for 4.4 inclusion, I will prepare a release candidate to submit for voting. Thanks, Matteo

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-926) Compacted entries are not properly synced before updating index

2016-05-04 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15270692#comment-15270692 ] Hudson commented on BOOKKEEPER-926: --- SUCCESS: Integrated in bookkeeper-master #1368 (See