[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1008) Move to netty4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15989541#comment-15989541 ] Kishore Kasi Udayashankar commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008: --- [~eoli

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #134: BOOKKEEPER-1042 Deploy SNAPSHOTS of master to public ...

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/134 @merlimat I think that those project need to have the same version as the other modules. Actually they are used to create artifacts for compat tests but for instance the artifacts which sup

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1042) Deploy SNAPSHOTS of master to public Apache Repository

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15989236#comment-15989236 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1042: Github user eolivelli commen

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-552) 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988986#comment-15988986 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-552: --- Github user jvrao commented on

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #114: BOOKKEEPER-552: 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation

Github user jvrao commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/114 +1 On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > So it seems that this patch contains the fix for the failing tests on > master branch, they are very annoying f

Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master #1729

See -- [...truncated 23.14 KB...] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.581 sec - in org.apache.bookkeeper.test.AsyncLedgerOpsTest Running org.apache.bookkee

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-552) 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988703#comment-15988703 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-552: --- Github user eolivelli commented

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #114: BOOKKEEPER-552: 64 Bits Ledger ID Generation

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/114 So it seems that this patch contains the fix for the failing tests on master branch, they are very annoying for everyone who is creating PRs and for nightly builds (and for automatic snapshots

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-391) Support Kerberos authentication of bookkeeper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988695#comment-15988695 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-391: --- Github user eolivelli commented

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #110: BOOKKEEPER-391 Support Kerberos authentication of boo...

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/110 @sijie if you are still OK with this patch can you merge it ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1008) Move to netty4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988683#comment-15988683 ] Enrico Olivelli commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008: - [~revans2] I am looking a

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #116: BOOKKEEPER-1008 Move to Netty4.1

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116 @kishorekasi Maybe you can add commits without squashing, this way we can track more easily the new changes you are pushing in. Thanks --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1008) Move to netty4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988661#comment-15988661 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008: Github user eolivelli commen

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1008) Move to netty4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988660#comment-15988660 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1008: Github user eolivelli commen

[GitHub] bookkeeper issue #116: BOOKKEEPER-1008 Move to Netty4.1

Github user eolivelli commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/116 I have checked out the lastest version of this PR But I am still seeing this kind of errors, for instance in BookieFailuresTest. Did you push your local code to GitHub ? ``` Tests

Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master-git-pullrequest #328

See Changes: [eolivelli] BOOKKEEPER-1042 Deploy SNAPSHOTS of master to public Apache Repository -- [...truncated 22.74 KB...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-rem

Re: Publish SNAPSHOT artifacts on Maven Central

I am currently discussing on the users@infra mailing list about how to achieve our goal. While playing with the deploy goal I succeeded in publishing the -SNAPSHOT version to the official apache snapshots repository In order to achieve it manually it is enough to follow the guide http://www.apache

[jira] [Commented] (BOOKKEEPER-1042) Deploy SNAPSHOTS of master to public Apache Repository

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15988606#comment-15988606 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-1042: GitHub user eolivelli opened

[GitHub] bookkeeper pull request #134: BOOKKEEPER-1042 Deploy SNAPSHOTS of master to ...

GitHub user eolivelli opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/134 BOOKKEEPER-1042 Deploy SNAPSHOTS of master to public Apache Repository Make all pom.xml files have a -SNAPSHOT version. Currently we have the 'compats' subprojects which have a strange

[jira] [Updated] (BOOKKEEPER-1042) Deploy SNAPSHOTS of master to public Apache Repository

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-1042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Enrico Olivelli updated BOOKKEEPER-1042: Summary: Deploy SNAPSHOTS of master to public Apache Repository (was: Deploy S

Re: Issue with entryLogger.leastUnflushedLogId, when preallocatedLogId rolls over Int.MAX

Il ven 28 apr 2017, 09:05 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > Hi Enrico, > > Let's try to figure things out in the email thread before create a JIRA. > Got it, sorry Enrico > > - Sijie > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> Thank you Charan, >> Can you create a JIRA? >> Do you

Re: Issue with entryLogger.leastUnflushedLogId, when preallocatedLogId rolls over Int.MAX

Hi Enrico, Let's try to figure things out in the email thread before create a JIRA. - Sijie On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Thank you Charan, > Can you create a JIRA? > Do you already have a fix? > > Il ven 28 apr 2017, 00:27 Charan Reddy G ha > scritto: > >> Hey, >

Re: Issue with entryLogger.leastUnflushedLogId, when preallocatedLogId rolls over Int.MAX

I think Bookkeeper-833 is irrelevant, no? Even it is Long.MAX, it would still have the roll over problem. The question is - is this really an issue? When roll over happen, it might cause an entry log file won't be garbage collected or compacted in this lifecycle of the bookie. But it doesn't actua