Dec 14 2018 - MoM

1. The release is delayed because of licensing issue. 2. Sam informed that salesforce is in the process of upstreaming local changes. Expect to see lots of pull requests from us. 3. Charan requested the team, especially Enrico Olivelli

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #1

Yup, Check how spark do it: http://apache.rediris.es/spark/spark-2.2.1/spark-2.2.1-bin-hadoop2.7.tgz -Ivan On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > Will check. New BSD is pretty explicit about this though. > > 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright > no

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #1

Will check. New BSD is pretty explicit about this though. 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. -Ivan On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 3:

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #1

Can you check what other scala projects do regarding the LICENCE files, regarding scala license? How do their LICENCE files look like? Sijie On Dec 14, 2017 4:07 AM, "Ivan Kelly" wrote: > -1 (binding) > > I really hate to do this again. I had everything checked out, and > everything was good. R

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.0, release candidate #1

-1 (binding) I really hate to do this again. I had everything checked out, and everything was good. RAT, findbugs, tests (though there was a few flakes, these are fixed in master), jepsen passed, notice files were good. I was writing the +1 email, and typing that I had checked "NOTICES and LICENSE